As Retrocession Day approaches, it will no doubt warm the cockles of many a pan-blue supporter to recall the old days when China was expanding.
For left-leaning pan-greens, there will be denial that the surrender of Japanese troops to ROC General Chen Yi (
As a Canadian, I think of Retrocession Day as the Taiwanese equivalent of Remembrance Day. Therefore I normally avoid thinking of contentious issues. Instead I think of the plight of ordinary soldiers.
However, the recent visit by Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi to the Yasukuni Shrine introduces a grain of controversy. Much is made of the fact that war criminals are buried at the Yasukuni Shrine, but many fail to appreciate that more than 30,000 Taiwanese soldiers who fought for the Japanese -- the vast majority under compulsion -- are also honored there.
These soldiers should be honored, and it is long overdue for Taiwan to establish its own shrine that will provide a home to the spirits of these weary and listless soldiers. Therefore I propose a constructive solution that could help relieve some of the anguish associated with Koizumi's annual treks to the Yasukuni Shrine: Let the Japanese and Taiwanese governments coordinate on the establishment of a shrine in Taiwan to honor Taiwanese soldiers that died while serving their Japanese colonial masters.
The next time Japan's prime minister visits the Yasukuni Shrine (as he surely will), let him symbolically lead the Taiwanese spirits from the shrine to a waiting jet, where they can join the prime minister on a voyage that will take them to Taiwan's newly constructed shrine.
While this gesture would not erase the memory of atrocities committed by the Japanese against countless Chinese during WWII, it will certainly be a comfort to the families of the fallen Taiwanese colonial soldiers, who will no longer have to visit a shrine that also honors war criminals when they want to honor their ancestors.
I realize the probability of this happening is low. But as long as I am dreaming, let me also suggest the while the Japanese prime minister helps consecrate the Taiwan shrine, he also apologize for the treatment of Taiwanese comfort women during WWII.
Thor McGillacuddy
Taipei
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past