Since President Chen Shui-bian (
What has gone wrong? One problem has been the government's desperate attempt to try to please all of the people all of the time.
A second problem is the administration's inclination to "govern by media." More often than not, it appears as if newspaper opinion pages are what create the government's priorities and guide its agenda-setting and policy-making decisions. Government officials hammer out decisions according to columnists' opinions, while lawmakers pose questions on the legislative floor based on what they read in the tabloids.
Hiding behind the protection of their legislative immunity, many pro-China lawmakers cite yet-to-be-confirmed media reports, fanning erroneous accusations against government officials. The pro-China media then picks up on the lawmakers' pontificating, repeating the allegations and driving the vicious cycle of smearing the government through yet another round.
It is understandable that bureaucrats and government agencies prepare media clippings in order to brief their superiors on what opinion pages have said about their performance and to stay in touch with the latest trends and opinions.
However, given the make-up of the nation's media -- the majority of which for historical reasons leans toward a certain party and shares a common interest with the pan-blue camp -- the administration's eager-ness to be well thought of simply leaves it battered and bruised.
The pro-China media is good at two-handed maneuvers that distort the facts while faking public-opinion pieces in an attempt to influence the government's policies. They have been far too successful.
It's sad that the government has often given into such pressure. This, coupled with its inability to efficiently convey its own messages, create the impression of continuous policy flip-flops.
The recent furor over China Steel Corp chairman Lin Wen-yuan's (
Of course the media outlets that have made such allegations and inferences will proclaim that they are simply exercising freedom of the press and holding the administration accountable in order to safeguard the people's interests. But to whom are they holding the government accountable? Whose interests are they guarding? The people in Taiwan or those in China?
The pan-green camp, however, shares a portion of the blame for allowing the pan-blue media to manipulate stories without being challenged. The lack of unity within the DPP has exacerbated this problem. Political struggles among DPP factions have led some people to "leak" a story or information to the pro-China media in order to attack another faction.
The DPP needs to snap out of its lethargy and get its act together. It needs to take the initiative and map out strategies to deter its "death from a thousand [paper] cuts." Better late than never.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS