It was heartening to hear US President George W. Bush liken Communism to Islamic militants who are trying to enslave nations. ("Islamic militants trying to `enslave' nations: Bush," Oct. 7, page 1.). Yet it is so disheartening to see the US take such an ambiguous stand for so long on the immediate threat Taiwan faces from China.
China does not just threaten to enslave nations. It has already done so -- in Tibet and East Turkestan. It also tried its hand in South Korea, Vietnam, attempting an evil empire stretching from Mongolia to the Taiwan Strait, from North Korea to Hong Kong.
There is no moderate government in the territories China controls. If it controlled another nation such as Taiwan, where would it all end, until someone call its bluff? In the case of the Communist Chinese empire, they try to rally "Chinese nationals" all over the world, while they enslave the so-called "Chinese" Hans, Mongolians, Muslims, and countless ethnic minority groups willing or unwilling to be called "Chinese."
We praise Bush for his clear view as a leader in Iraqi policy. Yet, we must ask: Where is his clear view on communist China? Knowing the similarities between communism and militant Muslims, would it not lend credibility to his conviction on Iraq, if he also held the same conviction about Taiwan? I have always greatly admired Ronald Reagan for his clear views as a leader, in principals, and in the way he achieved them. A man who did not particularly like to be bothered with details, yet he had a keen sense of choosing the right people to take charge.
It was the likes of Jimmy Carter, Richard Nixon, Detente, SALT I, SALT II, that elevated Russia to the status of an "evil empire," threatening a third world war. It was Ronald Reagan's clear sense, calling Russia's bluff, that brought down that empire. It is the ambiguity in the "one China" policy that allows likes of Zhu Chenghu (
Taiwan, under the past KMT regime, may be like the Vietnam of old, or the Philippines under Marcos. But Taiwan is an entirely different nation now. Taiwan is the kind of nation that Bush could only wish for in Iraq.
Of course we are still in the Iraq mess right now. Yet in lieu of China's clear threat to Taiwan, it is not too early to think about how to deal with the last evil empire on earth.
Supporting full sovereignty for Taiwan ["US should support full sovereignty for Taiwan," Oct. 8, page 8] would be a small but definite step forward. Not only would it create a clear view of the world he is leading, it would greatly enhance Bush's credibility on Iraq, at least in this small corner of the Taiwanese-American community, and to uphold his conviction on the simple American value of freedom and democracy, and his determination to stand against tyrants.
Chen Ming-Chung
Chicago, Illinois
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US