The awarding of the Nobel peace prize to Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency, was celebrated last week. But this month sees a landmark event concerning another Nobel peace prize-winner that is less of a cause for international congratulation. In fact, it is a cause for international shame.
On Oct. 24, Aung San Suu Kyi, the leader of Myanmar's democracy movement who won the Nobel peace award in 1991, will mark her 10th year in detention at the hands of Myanmar's military junta. Suu Kyi was held under house arrest from 1989 to 1995, following elections that her National League for Democracy (NLD) won but which the generals overturned, and from 2000 to 2002.
In May 2003, she was arrested again after an unknown number of NLD supporters were killed or beaten in the notorious "Depayin massacre."
The conditions under which Suu Kyi, aged 60, is now held in her Rangoon home are becoming more onerous, according to the Myanmar Campaign UK.
"She is allowed no visitors, her phone line has been cut, her post intercepted. NLD volunteers providing security at her compound have been removed. The UN envoy to Myanmar has been barred from entering the country," it said.
In a report to the UN General Assembly last month, Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, the special rapporteur on Myanmar for the UN's Commission on Human Rights, said gross violations were ongoing. Widespread reports of forced labor, violence against minorities, rape, extortion and expropriation by government forces continue to be received, Mr Pinheiro said.
He dismissed last March's national political convention, organized by the junta as part of a supposed reform and reconciliation program, because opposition parties were banned from attending. Pinheiro said 1,100 political prisoners remained in jail. And partly because he too had been prevented from visiting Myanmar since Nov. 2003, he said he was deeply concerned about Suu Kyi.
"It is deeply regrettable that NLD general-secretary Daw Aung San Suu Kyi celebrated her 60th birthday under house arrest," he said.
"Her virtual solitary confinement and lack of access to NLD colleagues run counter to the spirit of national reconciliation ... The transition to a full, participatory and democratic system in Myanmar can no longer be postponed," he said.
For too many years, such calls for action in Myanmar have been heard and politely ignored. But in a significant shift towards a more engaged if not confrontational stance, the administration of US President George W. Bush signaled last month that it is not only listening; it has decided to act. Speaking in Washington, Eric John, the US State Department's deputy assistant secretary for East Asia, served notice that time may finally be running out for the junta.
"The Burmese regime remains exceptionally repressive and is becoming even harsher in its treatment of its people," John said.
"We are working with our partners to support efforts to place Myanmar on this month's Security Council agenda. Myanmar's junta must take steps ... to bring its deplorable human rights practices into conformity with international standards," he said.
If the US succeeds in winning Security Council backing, a new resolution could deem Myanmar a threat to international peace and security. On that basis, UN demands would include the immediate release of Ms Suu Kyi and other political prisoners, free access for the UN's envoys and aid agencies, and genuine, UN-facilitated moves by the junta towards the restoration of democracy -- on pain of international sanctions and other, unspecified collective UN action.
The tougher US position is likely to alarm neighboring countries such as China and the Association of South-East Asian Nations, leading traders and investors in Myanmar.
But Washington's impatience with their "softly, softly" diplomatic approach, which even proponents admit has not achieved very much, is one of the reasons why the US stance is hardening.
Another reason appears to be concern that turmoil in Myanmar and resulting refugee problem poses a threat to regional stability and if left to fester, could spill beyond its borders. The US also recently named Myanmar as a country of concern in respect of its government's failure to stem (and reported connivance in) narcotics trafficking.
In a broader sense, unchecked misrule in Myanmar represents a clear-cut challenge to Bush's second term "freedom and democracy" agenda. US officials know that they can hardly champion such causes in Iraq and the wider Middle East while ignoring egregious abuse in other regions.
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice named Myanmar as one of the world's "outposts of tyranny" when she took office. Others include Iran, North Korea, Cuba and Belarus, countries on which US pressure has also been growing to varying degrees.
There will certainly be scepticism that anything substantive will be done on Myanmar after so many years of international inertia.
Regional countries may actively oppose any policy that smacks of US-initiated or enforced regime change. Britain, the former colonial power, has so far been notably ambivalent about the US move at the UN.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers