On Oct. 8, in Shantou, China, Lai Fu-chu (賴福助), a visiting fisherman from Ilan, was beaten to death in broad daylight while Chinese policemen looked on.
The murderers were 20 or so local thugs, and the truck driver with whose truck Lai's car had collided. The slaying scene, as far as one can gather from the news report, mirrors eerily a chilling rampage, occasionally aired on the PBS channel, in which 20 or so chimpanzees gang up on a helpless chimp and beat him to death.
Putting the two incidents side by side, one can't but be alarmed by the savage nature displayed.
Anthropologists tell us that humans differ from chimps because humans have developed ethics and have knowledge of their consequences. This does not bear up with what happened to Lai. It was purely savage and utterly lawless.
This tragic event has several implications. First, China is still a lawless nation. Second, the brazen behavior psychologically correlates with the general attitude upheld by the Chinese leadership. Readers probably still remember vividly, not so long ago, the TV footage of the contemptuous look shown by the former foreign minister Li Zhaoxing (李肇星), as he insolently debased the legitimacy of the Taiwanese leadership.
This impudence has been bolstered by the pan-blues' servile visits to China recently.
These sycophants have verbally reiterated one after another to the Chinese leadership -- ? and worst of all to the Chinese public -- that the Taiwanese government is a faux leadership, as Li Ao (李敖) has done also lately at Fudan University.
Now, if a supposedly erudite man, albeit overtly narcissistic, and a legislator to boot, is willing to thumb his nose at the Taiwanese people, who have elected the current leadership, and declare its mandate devoid of legitimacy, what can't the Chinese do to Taiwanese visitors or business-people. Yes, servility induces impudence, and impudence warrants violence.
Third, the prided code of ethics as developed by the Chinese is a sham in its current milieu. The Taiwanese who still take a great fancy to Chinese culture may do well to bear in mind that the Confucian code of ethics has no bearing whatsoever on its current political or legal or cultural habitat.
If people like Li Ao still want to chant about the glory of Chinese culture, perceptive folks should know that he chants from his memory of things past.
When Li Ao said that "there is no need to smash Taiwan to pieces" since the Taiwanese independence movement is only a "pretend act," who was he kidding? He was basically asking a hungry tiger not to eat the rabbit, since the rabbit was only pretending to run away.
This cajoling, ironically, had not been well received by the thugs in Shantou who claimed the life of a Taiwanese visitor by smashing him to pieces.
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Asked whether he declined to impose sanctions against China, US President Donald Trump said: “Well, we were in the middle of a major trade deal... [W]hen you’re in the middle of a negotiation and then all of a sudden you start throwing additional sanctions on — we’ve done a lot.” It was not a proud moment for Trump or the US. Yet, just three days later, John Bolton’s replacement as director of the National Security Council, Robert O’Brien, delivered a powerful indictment of the Chinese communist government and criticized prior administrations’ “passivity” in the face of Beijing’s contraventions of international law