Some younger members of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have recently launched a "new DPP movement," hoping to restore the party's ideals of freedom, democracy, fairness and justice, and revive its core values of self-examination and innovation.
The DPP has always upheld an image of reform, and one of the key indexes of a party's progression is its ability to critique itself. The path to reform is endless, and such internal calls for reform deserve praise. But when pushing for reform, greater space for discussion is also necessary to reach a consensus.
Unfortunately, sensational news reports and emotion have already blurred the focus. If we calm down and examine the proposals made by Taipei County commissioner candidate Luo Wen-jia (
Both camps hope that the party can examine itself, and respond to the public's expectation for morally upright officials and improved government efficiency.
The only difference is that Luo and Tuan appealed directly to the public through the media without any internal discussion first.
Hence, in the eyes of some DPP members, they are seen as dividing the party into different generations and staging an internal coup against the pioneers of democracy -- in effect biting the hand that fed them. They have caused unnecessary emotional turmoil and blurred the original intent of their comments.
Such emotions were on display when Chai and over a dozen lawmakers of the DPP's Mainstream Alliance held a press conference to propose a party self-critique, but also suggested that investigation commissions be establish to probe several major scandals. This shows that the DPP has maintained a high degree of diversity within its ranks, but also indicates that there is a lack of communication and trust among senior members.
The DPP constantly proclaims that it is a party capable of self-criticism. The call for an internal review by Luo might be considered to reflect many voters' expectations. But if this call for an internal review and reform is to avoid being seen as just a campaign gimmick, it might prove to be more effective to take up a discussion over DPP reform after the year-end elections.
One of the more feasible options is for party members to raise questions, and after they come up with possible solutions through an exchange of opinion and debates, their plans could be passed on to the party's highest body for review or implementation. This cannot be done in a short time. Nor can such reform proposals be thoroughly discussed and implemented in the current atmosphere,with the elections approaching.
The DPP should never divide itself based on members' ages, the generation they come from or past contributions. After all, the push democratization lies not only in the history of a party but also in repeated review, and an insistence on reform.
The DPP's ideal of implementing reform is a core value that needs to be encouraged more. The whole party's response to the calls for reform is the key to turning slogans into action.
The best opportunity for the DPP to set an example for Taiwan's democratic movement is to propose reforms and review them through a forum before the party's national congress and elections, which is scheduled for early next year. This way all party members and the public could participate in the discussions.
Huang Wei-cher is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US