Yesterday's Double Ten Day marked the sixth National Day since the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) came to power in 2000. In his address, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) told the nation, "We may say that the new government formed in 2000 was born to carry out reforms and that it exists to realize fairness and social justice. These missions represent the most solemn mandate from the 23 million people of Taiwan, and they embody the true meaning of the historic transfer of power between political parties."
Chen is right. After almost 50 years of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule, the DPP was elected because the Taiwanese hoped that it could replace the KMT's corrupt government with a cleaner one and bring a new vision to the nation.
Unfortunately, the DPP seems to have run out of steam. It faces a swelling tide of criticism, mostly focusing on Chen's changeable China policy and his failure to achieve major political and economic reforms. He has made a number of inappropriate appointments, and the deadlock between the governing and opposition camps remains unresolved. As a result, support for the government has plunged.
The government's predicament is due to a number of factors, but the biggest problem is a lack of clear direction on major policies. For example, despite China's military threat, Chen failed to condemn trips to China earlier this year by opposition leaders. On the contrary, he even asked People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
Moreover, the DPP is stuck at the stage of appointing people as a reward for their campaign contributions rather than on merit. This has created a culture of political sycophancy, and it is only natural that such officials will not enjoy high public esteem. After all, government is about effectively implementing policy and opening up new horizons -- not missions that any old party hack is equipped to carry out. Some of these people may even be tainted by involvement with financial organizations.
The DPP must therefore broaden the avenues through which it makes appointments. It can no longer confine itself to thinking only about what is advantageous to the party. Otherwise there will be a dearth of talent within the government, and this will give the opposition even more scope to boycott government policies.
When the DPP was elected, many hoped that it would eliminate the corrupt practices that were such a routine part of KMT rule. Now, the DPP faces scandals over corruption within the Financial Supervisory Commission and the hiring of Thai laborers to work on the Kaohsiung MRT. The party's motto, "With the green camp in power, quality is guaranteed," is now being questioned.
The public is calling for the government to harshly punish those implicated in corruption, regardless of their status or position. Chen himself affirmed this goal yesterday. Hopefully he means what he says, and will prod his party to judge such cases by the highest ethical standards. He must at all costs avoid following the KMT's example of whitewashing such incidents. For if he does, the people of Taiwan will lose faith in him.
The DPP should cherish the high expectations that ordinary people have for a home-grown party, and foster an image of working for the people. The drop in support for the DPP is a crisis -- but it is also an opportunity for the party to correct its faults.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS