Yesterday's Double Ten Day marked the sixth National Day since the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) came to power in 2000. In his address, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) told the nation, "We may say that the new government formed in 2000 was born to carry out reforms and that it exists to realize fairness and social justice. These missions represent the most solemn mandate from the 23 million people of Taiwan, and they embody the true meaning of the historic transfer of power between political parties."
Chen is right. After almost 50 years of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule, the DPP was elected because the Taiwanese hoped that it could replace the KMT's corrupt government with a cleaner one and bring a new vision to the nation.
Unfortunately, the DPP seems to have run out of steam. It faces a swelling tide of criticism, mostly focusing on Chen's changeable China policy and his failure to achieve major political and economic reforms. He has made a number of inappropriate appointments, and the deadlock between the governing and opposition camps remains unresolved. As a result, support for the government has plunged.
The government's predicament is due to a number of factors, but the biggest problem is a lack of clear direction on major policies. For example, despite China's military threat, Chen failed to condemn trips to China earlier this year by opposition leaders. On the contrary, he even asked People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
Moreover, the DPP is stuck at the stage of appointing people as a reward for their campaign contributions rather than on merit. This has created a culture of political sycophancy, and it is only natural that such officials will not enjoy high public esteem. After all, government is about effectively implementing policy and opening up new horizons -- not missions that any old party hack is equipped to carry out. Some of these people may even be tainted by involvement with financial organizations.
The DPP must therefore broaden the avenues through which it makes appointments. It can no longer confine itself to thinking only about what is advantageous to the party. Otherwise there will be a dearth of talent within the government, and this will give the opposition even more scope to boycott government policies.
When the DPP was elected, many hoped that it would eliminate the corrupt practices that were such a routine part of KMT rule. Now, the DPP faces scandals over corruption within the Financial Supervisory Commission and the hiring of Thai laborers to work on the Kaohsiung MRT. The party's motto, "With the green camp in power, quality is guaranteed," is now being questioned.
The public is calling for the government to harshly punish those implicated in corruption, regardless of their status or position. Chen himself affirmed this goal yesterday. Hopefully he means what he says, and will prod his party to judge such cases by the highest ethical standards. He must at all costs avoid following the KMT's example of whitewashing such incidents. For if he does, the people of Taiwan will lose faith in him.
The DPP should cherish the high expectations that ordinary people have for a home-grown party, and foster an image of working for the people. The drop in support for the DPP is a crisis -- but it is also an opportunity for the party to correct its faults.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS