During an interview with the Reuters news agency published on Friday, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said that there was no need to rush cross-strait talks. Chen said he wanted to "strive for delays while not fearing talks " -- which was a clever turn of Beijing's earlier phrase about "striving for talks while not fearing delays."
This slight change in wording clearly shows how the two sides of the Taiwan Strait differ in terms of their priorities on cross-strait relations.
The "talks" which Beijing seeks come with a big precondition, namely Taiwan's acceptance of the "one China" principle and "one country, two systems" -- which translates into accepting eventual unification. What Beijing is really after is not just any "talks," but a "resolution" of the cross-strait issue on Beijing's terms.
This goal is so important to Beijing that it does not want any intermediate steps, such as holding talks with Taiwan simply for the sake of holding talks or establishing friendlier relations with Taipei. For this "sacred" goal, Beijing is willing to pay the price of time, or delay talks.
This is why Chen explained his unwillingness to rush into talks in terms of preserving Taiwan's sovereign status. After all, if Taipei accepted Beijing's preconditions for talks, then Taiwan would be relegated to a role as a "Chinese province."
From Taiwan's standpoint, if holding talks with Beijing is necessarily preceded by acceptance of the "one China" principle, then naturally Taipei prefers postponing such talks as long as possible.
The truth of the matter is Chen was simply being polite and tactful in his interview. What he should have done was cut through the word games and clearly say there would be no talks unless there were no strings attached.
During the interview, Chen did not forget to mention that the pan-blue camp's leaders -- specifically former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) -- had been defeated by Beijing in this battle of wills and determination, since their visits to China this spring were on Beijing's terms. Not a single pan-blue leader or official managed to escape having to perform a song and dance about "one China" while visiting the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
One reason Beijing prefers delaying talks with Taipei is that it believes and hopes that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) will lose the 2008 presidential election. Beijing was shocked when Chen won in 2000 and then bitterly disappointed when he won re-election last year. Any hopes Beijing had that the pan-blues would be able to oust Chen through their ludicrous probe into the assassination attempt on Chen or lawsuits seeking to overturn last year's election have come to naught.
Many people see KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) as a leading contender for the presidency in 2008. He apparently does as well. While the next presidential election is still a few years away, the voters must keep their eyes and ears open and make sure that the next president of Taiwan will not roll over and beg to Beijing the way that Lien and Soong did.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
The Presidential Office on Saturday reiterated that Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation after US President Donald Trump said that Taiwan should not “go independent.” “We’re not looking to have somebody say: ‘Let’s go independence because the United States is backing us,’” Trump said in an interview with Fox News aired on Friday. President William Lai (賴清德) on Monday said that the Republic of China (ROC) — Taiwan’s official name — and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) are not subordinate to each other. Speaking at an event marking the 40th anniversary of the establishment of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Lai said
RSS