These days, the special arms budget has been a "hot" issue. Supporters and opponents continue to argue. Nonetheless, as a person from Taiwan, I want to use my experience in Australia to illustrate the importance of national security.
I have been living in Australia for more than seven years. I appreciate the peaceful atmosphere in Australia. Everyone there enjoys their lives and the environment they live in. Although Australia has strong alliances with Britain and the US, it still has to buy the most advanced weaponry in order to build a strong line of defense for itself. With this great military force, people living in Australia can enjoy the peaceful atmosphere and their economy can grow at a stable rate. Moreover, their government can send troops to help the US military in Iraq.
What the special arms budget is trying to accomplish for Taiwan is a promise that our military force will have more strength against our enemy and provide us with a better place to live. No doubt the special budget is a debt that we will have to carry for many years, and it is perhaps a heavy burden for all of us, but the outcome will give us a more secure environment and lead to better economic growth.
Qiu Yan-long
Australia
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers