With regard to Bob Kuo's (
Kuo talks about cases related to Taiwanese law and the bending or disrespect of it. Most of the cases he mentions however, are related to ethics rather than to law.
The case of the fiancee of the army captain is clearly such a case; there are no laws for this kind of case, there can only be ethical discussions and the law may only come into action if parties don't agree.
Modern technology is unlimited and the law -- which may also differ from country to country -- will always be slow in catching up. Downloading is therefore again an ethical matter. If you really like the music of a specific singer, then you ought to buy his or her CD rather than download it, for only that would shows your true appreciation for the artist. After all, would you like to work hard for free?
In Taiwan the word "money" is unfortunately the only and most important word. Ethics seems to be something for the "strange" or "stupid." It is considered stupid to do things for free, it is considered strange to obey the law. Ethics means thinking; thinking by the individual not only about him or herself within society, but also about society as a whole. Ethical behavior means being honest and straight, and these are not characteristics Taiwanese grew up with.
Ethics should be taught more, especially at the university level, since these students will be the upper working class of society. Only a person with respect for ethics will respect the law.
At the moment it is hard for young academics, who have studied abroad and come back with new ideas about how to improve Taiwan, to get their acquired experiences implemented. Ethics tells us that we should respect the young as much as we respect the old, but until this older generation has gone, the young will have a tough time in Taiwan. "Ethics" should therefore be a major subject at Taiwan's universities.
Elisabeth Rutten
the Netherlands
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with