With regard to Bob Kuo's (
Kuo talks about cases related to Taiwanese law and the bending or disrespect of it. Most of the cases he mentions however, are related to ethics rather than to law.
The case of the fiancee of the army captain is clearly such a case; there are no laws for this kind of case, there can only be ethical discussions and the law may only come into action if parties don't agree.
Modern technology is unlimited and the law -- which may also differ from country to country -- will always be slow in catching up. Downloading is therefore again an ethical matter. If you really like the music of a specific singer, then you ought to buy his or her CD rather than download it, for only that would shows your true appreciation for the artist. After all, would you like to work hard for free?
In Taiwan the word "money" is unfortunately the only and most important word. Ethics seems to be something for the "strange" or "stupid." It is considered stupid to do things for free, it is considered strange to obey the law. Ethics means thinking; thinking by the individual not only about him or herself within society, but also about society as a whole. Ethical behavior means being honest and straight, and these are not characteristics Taiwanese grew up with.
Ethics should be taught more, especially at the university level, since these students will be the upper working class of society. Only a person with respect for ethics will respect the law.
At the moment it is hard for young academics, who have studied abroad and come back with new ideas about how to improve Taiwan, to get their acquired experiences implemented. Ethics tells us that we should respect the young as much as we respect the old, but until this older generation has gone, the young will have a tough time in Taiwan. "Ethics" should therefore be a major subject at Taiwan's universities.
Elisabeth Rutten
the Netherlands
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms
RSS