In his speech to the UN summit on Sept. 15, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
China has indeed prospered. Last year alone its trade surplus with the US reached US$162 billion. By the end of last month, its foreign exchange reserves reached US$711 billion, the second highest in the world. If you add Hong Kong's foreign exchange reserves of US$120.8 billion, it actually tops the foreign reserves list.
The US, with its great economic strength, once reached out a helping hand to poor countries after World War II. Taiwan was a recipient of US aid. So China's offer was something it should do and was not surprising.
Oddly, however, Beijing's offer is not open to Taiwan's diplomatic allies, showing that its purpose was completely different from the goodwill shown by the US. This is another attempt to contain Taiwan's diplomatic efforts. In other words, it is just another attack on Taiwan. The recipients of Chinese aid should really thank Taiwan, without whom there would be no aid forthcoming from Beijing.
In addition, recipients of China's aid should understand that the so-called aid comes essentially from Taiwan. After all, most of China's foreign exchange reserves and its trade surplus were acquired through help from Taiwan. Read the following statistics if you do not believe it.
According to a report by Ernest Preeg, a senior fellow in the Trade and Productivity Manufacturers Alliance, recently prepared for the congressional US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, "Taiwan is the largest foreign investor in China, accounting for up to half of total foreign direct investment [FDI]."
Since China's FDI reached US$562.1 billion by the end of last year, Taiwan's investment over there was as much as US$281.05 billion.
Similarly, the IEEE Spectrum -- a magazine published by the US Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers -- recently pointed out in the article, "China's Tech Revolution": "Ironically, China's ascendance in semiconductors is almost entirely attributable to assistance from Taiwanese technologists."
On Sept. 18, the media reported that Taiwan's First International Computer Co had closed its last local assembly line, which was also the last line for the nation's notebook computer industry, thus completely relocating to China.
This sector has been one of the nation's most important electronic sectors over the past decade. In 2001, its output value ratio was 89 percent domestically and 4 percent in China. By last year, its output value ratio was 16 percent domestically and 82 percent in China. It is this sort of thing that has allowed China to supplant Taiwan as the kingdom of laptop computer manufacturing.
The total output value of Chinese information technology (IT) hardware is US$60.5 billion, which is the world's second highest and accounts for a large portion of China's exports. But 79 percent of it is contributed by Taiwanese businesses, showing that much of China's trade surplus is created by Taiwanese businesspeople.
In other words, China's economic achievement and the foreign aid it is able to offer are a result of Taiwanese "support."
As the saying goes, "To rear a tiger is to court calamity!" Today, China is receiving Taiwanese support on the one hand while attacking it on the other.
This situation is unbearable, but we can only blame ourselves for this situation.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy advisor to the president.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG?
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS