In his speech to the UN summit on Sept. 15, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
China has indeed prospered. Last year alone its trade surplus with the US reached US$162 billion. By the end of last month, its foreign exchange reserves reached US$711 billion, the second highest in the world. If you add Hong Kong's foreign exchange reserves of US$120.8 billion, it actually tops the foreign reserves list.
The US, with its great economic strength, once reached out a helping hand to poor countries after World War II. Taiwan was a recipient of US aid. So China's offer was something it should do and was not surprising.
Oddly, however, Beijing's offer is not open to Taiwan's diplomatic allies, showing that its purpose was completely different from the goodwill shown by the US. This is another attempt to contain Taiwan's diplomatic efforts. In other words, it is just another attack on Taiwan. The recipients of Chinese aid should really thank Taiwan, without whom there would be no aid forthcoming from Beijing.
In addition, recipients of China's aid should understand that the so-called aid comes essentially from Taiwan. After all, most of China's foreign exchange reserves and its trade surplus were acquired through help from Taiwan. Read the following statistics if you do not believe it.
According to a report by Ernest Preeg, a senior fellow in the Trade and Productivity Manufacturers Alliance, recently prepared for the congressional US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, "Taiwan is the largest foreign investor in China, accounting for up to half of total foreign direct investment [FDI]."
Since China's FDI reached US$562.1 billion by the end of last year, Taiwan's investment over there was as much as US$281.05 billion.
Similarly, the IEEE Spectrum -- a magazine published by the US Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers -- recently pointed out in the article, "China's Tech Revolution": "Ironically, China's ascendance in semiconductors is almost entirely attributable to assistance from Taiwanese technologists."
On Sept. 18, the media reported that Taiwan's First International Computer Co had closed its last local assembly line, which was also the last line for the nation's notebook computer industry, thus completely relocating to China.
This sector has been one of the nation's most important electronic sectors over the past decade. In 2001, its output value ratio was 89 percent domestically and 4 percent in China. By last year, its output value ratio was 16 percent domestically and 82 percent in China. It is this sort of thing that has allowed China to supplant Taiwan as the kingdom of laptop computer manufacturing.
The total output value of Chinese information technology (IT) hardware is US$60.5 billion, which is the world's second highest and accounts for a large portion of China's exports. But 79 percent of it is contributed by Taiwanese businesses, showing that much of China's trade surplus is created by Taiwanese businesspeople.
In other words, China's economic achievement and the foreign aid it is able to offer are a result of Taiwanese "support."
As the saying goes, "To rear a tiger is to court calamity!" Today, China is receiving Taiwanese support on the one hand while attacking it on the other.
This situation is unbearable, but we can only blame ourselves for this situation.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy advisor to the president.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG?
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past