A massive rally in support of the government's arms-procurement budget is to take place today. The main purpose of the rally is to push for the speedy legislative review and approval of the special arms budget, as well as to highlight the importance of self-defense to Taiwan on the country's path toward "normalization."
It is open knowledge that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) have worked together to block the deliberation of the arms procurement budget by the legislature a total of 29 times. The bill has not even managed to make it to the legislative floor so far.
This farce has gone on for so long that even the US is questioning whether the government is serious about buying the weapons package on offer. So, it is high time for the people of Taiwan to step up and voice their support for the bill. Through today's rally, they can let the rest of the world and the US see that they do know the importance of maintaining a self-defense capability and that the pan-blue lawmakers do not represent the mainstream popular will on sovereignty-related issues.
Reportedly last week former US deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage told President Chen Shui-bian (
While as with any other multi-party democracy, competition and differences between the two major political parties in the US, it is nothing close to what the people of Taiwan have endured from the bickering between the pan-blues and pan-greens over the past few years.
The resentment that the pan-blue camp feels toward the Chen government has multiple roots -- the two biggest ones perhaps being kicked out of office in the 2000 presidential election and their confused sense of national identity. The former, aggravated by a second consecutive presidential defeat last year, has grown into an almost personal hatred, not only on the part of former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
On the other hand, the gap in national identification between the pan-blues and pan-greens has an even deeper and more complicated impact on the country -- the disputes over arms procurement being just one symptom. Obviously, the biggest and some would even say the only real enemy of Taiwan is its neighbor across the Taiwan Strait. Despite Beijing's rapid military build up and its missile threats to Taiwan, some segments in this country continue to view Taiwan as part of the great and mighty "China." They object to anything that stand in the way of "Chinese unification," let along buying arms to stand up against Beijing.
However, it must be made clear that the mainstream popular will is supportive of the arms procurement plan and fully aware of the military threat from China. Today's rally will provide an opportunity for these people to speak up and to pressure the pan-blue camp to answer to the demands and desires of the people of this country. Hopefully, the deadlock in the legislature can come to an end immediately -- for the sake of the nation.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS