The tentative agreement on North Korea's nuclear weapons is a face-saving coup for Chinese diplomacy and should ensure China succeeds in keeping the issue out of the UN Security Council, analysts say.
The six-party process has been a test of China's new international diplomacy and much has been riding on the outcome of a dialogue process it has initiated, hosted and driven.
Failure at the just-concluded fourth round of negotiations to produce concrete results could have made the multinational approach redundant and left China with egg on its face.
Analysts said Beijing was not prepared to let this happen and badgered the US and North Korea to ensure a positive outcome, rescuing the talks from a stalemate to a conclusion cautiously praised by world leaders.
The talks in Beijing ended on Monday with a North Korean pledge to give up its atomic weapons in return for energy and security guarantees.
"Getting a result was crucial as it is such a long-running issue. It was a face-saver for China," said Brian Bridges, an expert on North Asia at Lingnan University in Hong Kong.
"They've put a lot of diplomatic clout into this -- it shows China is a responsible member of the international community. If they had failed to come up with an agreement it would probably have ended the six-party process. It would have reflected poorly on China," he said.
China's state-run media has taken every opportunity to praise Beijing's leadership on the issue, with the official Xinhua news agency saying on Tuesday that the agreement vindicated the six-party process.
"The passing of the statement proved that the six-party talks are an effective way to solve the Korean peninsula's nuclear issue in a peaceful manner," it said in a commentary.
The China Daily said it showed "diplomacy is paying off."
As well as its reputation and its relations with the US, which has pressured China to push its Stalinist neighbor harder to compromise on its nuclear weapons ambitions, China had other issues of concern.
Not least was a threat by the US to take the issue to the UN Security Council and press for sanctions against North Korea if the talks ended in failure.
China fears such a move could ultimately cause the North Korean regime to collapse and unleash turmoil on its borders, potentially opening the door to a flood of refugees seeking to flee an already impoverished country.
David Zweig, a political analyst at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, said this fear would have been nagging China as it harried the US and North Korea to find a deal.
"There's no question that they needed to see something concrete out of the talks," he said.
"The big risk for them was the US threatening to take the issue to the Security Council and seek sanctions. They wanted to avoid that at all costs.
"Sanctions would cause big problems for China. They could live with a nuclear North Korea but not with turmoil on its borders," he said.
Despite coming through with a first common document in four rounds of talks stretching over two years, much of the phrasing was vague and questions on the timing and verification of the dismantling of the North's nuclear weapons went unanswered.
And North Korea's hawkish statement on Tuesday that it would only scrap its nuclear programs after the US provides it with a light water reactor has also raised questions about the document.
However Dingli Shen, deputy director of the Center for American Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai, said the joint statement was the best anybody could have hoped for.
"It was a success of diplomacy that tried to keep all avenues possible open," he said.
"But at the end of the day, there has been no movement, it was just to have something to announce. China sees a vague statement as better than no statement," he said.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose