Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's vital gamble has paid off. The triumph of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in the Sept. 11 lower house election has redefined Koizumi's neoconservative leadership for the next four years.
Japan has been desperate to revitalize its national pride. Prime Minister Koizumi's neo-conservatism uses a maverick image in order to satisfy modern people's expectations.
Japan's neoconservatism is a recent term used by the Asian media, referring to a new generation of Japanese conservatives. It conveys a common desire for national reinvigoration among Japanese elites and intellectuals.
The neoconservatives are distinguished from the older generation of Japanese conservatives with regard to their political attitude. Japanese "neos" take a more "active" view of the JSDF (Japan Self-Defense Forces).
The "neos" regard themselves as free from responsibility or guilt for Japan's conquests and wartime history. Meanwhile, they view China as a country that harbors historical grievances for political gain, rather than accepting Japan's apologies. As nationalists, the neos express strong national pride and stress Japan's international role.
Koizumi's overwhelmingly victory in the lower house election not only strengthens his leadership, but also shores up Japan's neo-conservatives. The LDP and its coalition ally will have a key two-thirds majority in the new parliament.
Domestically, it means Koizumi can now override most objections from the upper house and push through reforms.
Moreover, Koizumi's controversial foreign policy, such as dispatching troops to Iraq and his annual visits to the Yasukuni shrine, seem to be understood and tacitly approved by the Japanese public.
As nationalism ferments, Japanese neo-conservatism will continue being active in this country's political landscape. With his flowing hair and striking looks, charismatic Koizumi is leading the Japanese to a new era of neo-conservatism, though forthcoming challenges are inevitable.
Pei-chun Han
Waseda University, Tokyo
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.