As a soldier in Taiwan's military, I have something to say about arms procurement, something that is different from the civilian's point of view.
Can you imagine -- or believe -- that we are using weapons that were made decades ago?
Although we are economically, politically and technically developed, there's still something that needs to be improved. Even China is buying weapons from Russia, isn't it? The joint exercise they conducted recently is obviously a threat at the doorstep.
Due to the lack of ability to produce certain kinds of advanced and sophisticated weaponry, we need other nations' assistance to protect our country from China. And I believe the moms and dads at home would be pleased to see that their boys have better weapons to secure them against getting injured while doing their duty.
The national defense budget is being downgraded year after year, while China is upgrading theirs in double digits from year to year.
We are not asking for war, but we have to be prepared when it's time.
Under the circumstances, we are desperately in need of support to purchase new weapons. I totally agree that the items bought should be considered carefully and the price should be reasonable and acceptable. But it is definitely a must to acquire better equipment than what we have now. The budget has been cut down, and I hope the legislators can think about the security we have to provide for Taiwan.
Ma Hsiao-ling
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers