With around 50 to 60 percent of the nation's banking assets controlled by state-run entities, financial regulators are under pressure to meet President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) ambitious goal of halving the number of state banks to six by the end of this year. Though consolidation tops the government's financial reform agenda as a way to increase the competitiveness of local banks, the pace of merger activity has been slow, despite some merger and acquisition deals being sealed in the past few years.
Minister of Finance Lin Chuan's (
Taiwan Business Bank is the nation's ninth-largest lender by assets, with a market share of 4.1 percent and a distribution network of 125 branch offices. It is 41 percent owned by the Ministry of Finance and a few other state banks. Though it has the political mission of granting loans to small and medium-sized enterprises, the bank's market share in this niche is only 12 percent due to strong competition. But because of its past weakness in credit appraisal in its role as a funding channel for particular economic sectors, this lender has lost an average of NT$1.6 per share in each of the past four years.
Critics are concerned that the ministry's failure to sell its stake in Taiwan Business Bank may lead to a more cautious approach by potential buyers of domestic banks, given higher-than-expected integration risks such as strained labor relations. Market observers also worry that the four-day work stoppage by the bank's union could inspire other state bank unions to follow suit and obstruct mergers in the future. Chang Hwa Commercial Bank's (
Moreover, the Taiwan Business Bank incident has caught lawmakers' attention, and may prompt them to demand reviews of every government proposal on disposing of state bank shares. It will certainly increase uncertainty for investors and make it more difficult to reach Chen's target.
The planned privatization of the Central Trust of China (
Even so, the government should learn something from the incident and act to respond to investors' demands for a more open and transparent bidding process. Most importantly, the government needs to convince the market of its political will to proceed with privatization. If the government stops pushing forward, the market will take it as a sign that something is terribly wrong with the policy.
Labor disputes may have been the straw that broke the camel's back as far as Taiwan Business Bank is concerned. But even before those troubles, the bank's poor asset quality and performance made potential buyers far underbid the finance ministry's price targets.
This should teach both management and employees the lesson that their main responsibility is to strengthen the bank's operating efficiency, because successfully privatizing the bank is in the entire nation's interest. Anyone who jeopardizes that privatization and thus hurts the bank's business returns will therefore not be forgiven, even if they do so in the name of job security.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS