A year-long, ambitious effort to overhaul the UN for the 21st century was cut down to size in last-minute negotiations that rescued the blueprint in time for this week's World Summit.
Coming shortly after a damning inquiry into the former UN oil-for-food program for Iraq, the final document presented on Tuesday offered few bold proposals for polishing the world body's image quickly.
Disputed themes such as more credible policing of human rights, improving oversight and accountability at the world body, strong pledges on environmental protection or fighting the threat of nuclear terrorism were watered down in the text.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Sixty years after the UN was founded at the end of World War II, the aims included adding new members to the Security Council to reflect changed world realities, and shifting power from the one-country, one-vote General Assembly to the UN secretary-general to help fight waste and corruption.
Leaders from more than 170 countries have a much more modest document on the table for their three-day summit which started on Wednesday.
But the US, which has spearheaded the drive for change, called the 35-page text a good start.
"This is not the end of the reform effort," said US Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns. "It really is the beginning of a permanent reform effort that must be underway at the United Nations."
"We want the UN to be effective around the world but it has to be more efficient," he told reporters, adding that he hopes the deal would reduce pressure in the US Congress to withhold some UN dues.
A broad range of countries backed setting up a new Human Rights Council as the new UN human rights body, but detailed provisions were blocked by a small number of countries countries that Burns indicated had poor human rights records themselves, though he named no names.
The council is meant to replace the UN Human Rights Commission, widely viewed as discredited because countries with dismal human rights records can sit on it. But leaders are leaving the decision on the overhaul to the General Assembly.
Meanwhile, critics faulted the US for the lack of stronger commitments on fighting hunger and poverty in many parts of the world. Steps meant to tighten the way the UN is run and handles its money were left up to the General Assembly to decide.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who has faced strong US pressure to push ahead with reforms, showed his frustration about a group of about 30 key countries that wrapped up the deal in a crush of late-night sessions over the past two weeks.
"There were spoilers in the group, let's be quite clear about it," he told reporters. "There were governments that were not willing to make concessions."
He did not name any, but pressure groups following the talks have blamed Iran, Pakistan, Egypt, Syria, Venezuela and the US, among others, for blocking various points during the discussions.
Nicola Reindorp, spokeswoman for the Oxfam aid group, said negotiators seemed stuck "on the lowest common denominator."
Far from showing nations united, the negotiations showed that every country or bloc of nations found something to object to. Only Monday, nearly every page in the draft document had bracketed paragraphs and highlighted sentences, indicating disagreements.
The text represents a year's worth of work to reaffirm the UN's principles and spell out changes of such arrangements as its outdated preference for World War II's winners and losers. The US, China, Russia, France and Britain have retained vetoes in the all-important Security Council.
But arguments about which countries should sit on an expanded Security Council became so publicly divisive that members have put the matter off for the time being.
British Ambassador Emyr Jones-Parry said he would have liked a stronger reform blueprint.
"But don't expect Rome to be built in a day," he told reporters. "It will take time."
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS