The Legislative Yuan will reconvene next Tuesday, amid hopes that a prolonged political standoff between the governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the pan-blue opposition can finally end.
Although a new opportunity to break the ice has appeared, continued distrust still obstructs rational and healthy interaction between the government and the pan-blue legislators.
The year-end local elections will further darken the opportunity for constructive interaction between the Chen Shui-bian (
Chen and his DPP colleagues have shown goodwill to the pan-blue camp by adjusting the controversial budget for the purchase of three major defensive weapon systems from the US in the hope of receiving a friendly response from the opposition.
Chen's appeal was supported by Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平). Wang suggested that the bill should at the very least be freed from the boycott imposed by the pan-blue majority in the legislature's Procedure Committee and properly referred to the National Defense Committee for review and open discussion.
Regretfully, legislators from the People First Party (PFP) remain steadfast in blocking the budget. Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
In addition to that long-delayed bill, numerous urgently needed budgets and draft laws related to the people's livelihood are also awaiting review and passage. These include the special NT$80 billion (US$2.46 billion) flood prevention budget, governmental streamlining in the draft revisions to the Organic Law of the Executive Yuan (
The public favors an end to legislative obstructionism and villainy and an opening of rational dialogue between the governing and opposition parties.
Untying the political knot depends primarily on the KMT's new leadership, especially Ma. The extent to which Ma can avoid interference from his predecessor Lien Chan (
Ma should take the initiative by making a fresh start and abandoning the KMT's past destructive strategy of boycotting everything proposed by Chen. He should also try to persuade the PFP to stop putting its narrow partisan interests above the public good.
Ma should persuade his allies in the PFP to heed the public's will. Instead of being held hostage by the PFP over nominations for local elections, Ma should should put into practice his theory of bringing moderation and pragmatism into Taiwanese politics.
The government should also refrain from engaging in a war with the pan-blue opposition. Premier Frank Hsieh's (
A group composed of experts, academics and opinion leaders must be formed to monitor legislators' performance. Only through such public monitoring can Taiwanese politics be put back on the right track.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,