I must take issue with your editorial "Learning respect for typhoons," (Sept. 2, page 8). You have simply taken what you read or was given to you by "US officials" and printed it without question. I wonder who these "US officials" are that you quoted. Are they the same ones around President George W. Bush as he stands in Washington talking about the disaster that he has only seen from his 747?
The people still in New Orleans did not stay inside the city because of a "cry wolf" mentality, nor were they ignorant about the forces of wind. The ones who "ignored" -- as your editorial stated -- the evacuation were the poor. They had no way to get out of the city. It is tough to leave your home, drive many hours away and stay in a hotel for days or weeks, if you don't have a car and you don't have money.
About 150,000 people in New Orleans lived below the poverty line before Katrina, 100,000 of them in abject poverty, making less than US$8,000 (NT$262,000) a year. Your staff should have viewed some other sites to find information about the people still in New Orleans and could have used the editorial to discuss ways that governments can in times of natural disasters help the ones who need it the most, the poor.
I completely agree with Mike McKenzie (Letters, Sept. 2, page 8) Taiwan should send any and all relief to the US now. They should offer to send Taiwanese medical staff along with search and rescue teams. Then when China objects it will add a little talking point for the press when Hu arrives for his visit.
Benjamin White
Touliu City
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers