The answer to whether there will be war or peace in the Taiwan Strait does not rest with Taipei, but with Beijing. Unless it is for the sake of self-defense, Taiwan will never send troops to attack China. Beijing's position, however, is different. It has a history of saber-rattling and sending troops to neighboring countries to teach them a lesson.
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (
The purpose seems noble, but the focus of its activities should be to lobby Chinese leaders, not locals.
In order to achieve his "goal of lasting peace" across the Taiwan Strait, Lien should concentrate on convincing Beijing that regardless of what happens on the political stage in Taiwan, it must not give in to rash impulses and launch an attack. Every effort must be made to find peaceful and rational ways of negotiating a solution to any cross-strait political or military conflict, and this is the message that he should be carrying.
As long as Lien is willing to play this role and enlighten Beijing and the Chinese people on the importance of peace, his efforts might do more good than harm.
However, over the past few months, Lien and his party have adopted the wrong approach on any number of matters: resuming cross-strait negotiations and signing a "peace accord" on a party-to-party basis, promoting cross-strait exchanges without the input of the government and improving communication between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party.
Following the meeting between Lien and Chinese President Hu Jintao (
It appears to be turning out, then, that Lien is only interested in changing the attitude of Taiwanese rather than of the Chinese who are threatening them.
As unlikely as it is, if Lien is able to reduce Chinese prejudice and create a situation in which Beijing agrees to some form of genuinely respectful understanding or agreement, and does so without damaging Taiwan's dignity or national security, then Lien's peace foundation will have a certain meaning and value.
But if Lien wishes to use his foundation as a political weapon, drawing on economic and political support from China in an attempt to undermine Taiwan's democracy and assist the KMT regain power, as is most likely, then he and it should be condemned.
Lien's foundation could make a positive contribution to cross-strait peace, but it could also serve to further disrupt Taiwan's politics.
All depends on the decisions he will have to make. A slight difference in direction can have markedly different consequences, and there is often only a very fine line between the heroes and the villains of history.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS