Since the hype for the two-day Taike Rock Concert on Aug. 19 and Aug. 20 in Taipei and the use of the term "Taike" (台客) in reports about the Miss Taiwanese Beauty Contest 2005, the term has become a subject of public debate.
The term Taike should be a neutral term that is a geographic indicator of a place where Taiwanese culture and attitude predominate. But if we look at it in historical terms, we see that the term came into use after "Retrocession" when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government rode roughshod over Taiwanese sensibilities. As the ruling party, it imposed its language, art and folk customs on Taiwan, turning Taiwanese into guests in their own country.
These kinds of wounds exist in all multiethnic nations, for when one culture is in a position to interpret the cultural norms of the country, it imposes this as the mainstream. This is why the term taike offends some people, who feel it is derogatory. If we understand the historical context of the term, we know that when the Taiwanese media describe the ravenous publicity hound Hsu Chun-mei (
But the key question is, who has the power of cultural interpretation?
The fine performances of Boddy Chen (
Some of the older generation may be concerned that young people should take pride in being described by the term Taike, as it has become a derogatory expression. But, looked at in another way, if Taiwanese can now incorporate local elements into their artistic development and have developed sufficient self-confidence to create their own identity, isn't this a clear example of Taiwanese retrieving the right to interpret their own culture?
Maybe, by using this different approach to interpret the meaning of Taike in a relaxed and humorous fashion, Taiwanese people will be able to escape from under the shadow of a dominant state-imposed culture. All Taiwanese should stand firm and allow a mix of the cultures of the US, Japan, Hong Kong and Taiwan to develop. In this way, we can help form a kind of Taiwanese taste with a strong sense of local style.
Zheng Yu-chieh is a graduate in philosophy of Fu Jen Catholic University.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers