As soon as the announcement was made that the March 19, 2004 assassination attempt on President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) would not lead to a trial and verdict, some reporters and legislators began express opinions over what the investigation should or should not have done. If it really was that easy to handle the investigation, then wouldn't that mean that all the holders of masters and doctoral degrees who have examined physical evidence at the Criminal Investigation Bureau (CIB) for decades are really quite stupid?
When we reconstructed the scene of the shooting in Tainan, we fully respected and followed every idea and instruction from US forensics expert Henry Lee (李昌鈺).
One incident, however, left a deep impression on us. A dispute arose between CIB Commissioner Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and Lee over the position of Lu's leg wound -- a small displacement of the wound led to a huge difference in the reconstruction of the bullet's path. Lee lost his temper over the incident, and the atmosphere was so thick that everyone was tense.
Afterward, Hou suggested calling Lu to clarify the wound's position, and Lee accepted the correction about the location of the wound. He can be persistent, but he also knows when to move forward or step back. There was no personal animosity involved in the dispute, only a search for the truth.
If the general public sees the bureau as a tool of the government, its investigations will be influenced by the authorities, and the willingness to trust CIB reports will suffer. We understand this, and we can live with it. Besides, why would Lee fly in from the US to help the government fabricate a lie?
If Lee had been able to find the smallest fabrication in this investigation and had then used scientific proof to overturn the government's findings, he would have been remembered for generations to come.
Wasn't he ruthless in announcing that former US president Bill Clinton's semen was found on Monica Lewinski's dress? A US president was exposed by Lee, a US citizen. Would Lee really fear Chen? Two words will suffice to explain why he chose the thorny road: "the truth."
Let's take the opposite view for a moment. Hypothesize that forensic scientists were to reveal that the shooting was fabricated. We'd go down in history, swimming in glory.
Should it appear that the shooting was not fabricated, however, we are instead met with questions and unreasonable criticism from every quarter. It is easy to see which result would be preferable. Once again, two words will suffice to explain why we have chosen the thorny road: "the truth."
Criminal forensics is built on scientific principles, and it must hold up to repeated testing. Regardless of who does a test and how many times it is repeated, the result will be the same.
The results announced by Lee were the same as the CIB's, but those who don't want to believe the results continue to disbelieve. I really do not understand how Taiwan could come to this impasse.
The people most humbled by the death of the alleged shooter, Chen Yi-hsiung (陳義雄), were the members of the special investigation team -- one more step and we could have delivered the truth.
If we were to examine the shooting investigation based on the same standards as other major investigations, the truth would be considered to have been exposed long ago.
Justice lives in the heart of man. Time will bring justice to the CIB and it will lay the truth bare.
Chien Meng-hui is a forensic science officer with the Central Investigation Bureau.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS