The government launched a campaign yesterday codenamed "Ching Kung" -- meaning "clear sky" -- to sweep foreign vessels out of the waters surrounding Kinmen and Matsu. The primary targets of the campaign are, of course, the Chinese fishing boats, smugglers and "survey" ships that linger in the vicinity, and in turn become the root of many criminal, social and health problems for Taiwan.
Chinese vessels have been entering Taiwanese waters to smuggle goods and illegal immigrants to the outlying islands or Taiwan proper. The goods being smuggled range from agricultural products and livestock -- which escape health and sanitary inspections and therefore expose Taiwan to various different types of diseases -- to drugs and guns, which have their own danger.
As for the people smuggled in and out of Taiwan via this channel, the social and criminal problems created go without saying. Many Chinese vessels disguised as fishing boats in fact serve as shuttle buses for fugitives from Taiwan to escape to the other side of the Taiwan Strait, helping them avoid capture and punishment for their crimes. Through the same channels, illegal immigrants from China are brought into Taiwan, some voluntarily, while others are forced to work, sometimes even in underworld-related activities, such as prostitution, theft or drug-peddling.
An even more serious problem is the threat to national security. At least some of the boats trespassing in these waters are in fact conducting espionage on the orders of the Chinese government.
For example, an "oil survey" ship named Fen-Dou No. 4 (
The ironic thing is this: It turns out that state-owned Chinese Petroleum Corp (中油) actually signed an agreement with the Chinese state-owned oil company in question to jointly survey under the sea for oil reserves. This in turn served as an excuse used by the Chinese side for the intrusion in question. This highlights the risks that Taiwanese companies face in doing business with Chinese companies -- to be used and manipulated in a way that endangers Taiwan's security. Furthermore, even though there is such an agreement in place, in order to enter Taiwan's waters Fen-Dou No. 4 must nevertheless comply with Taiwan's laws and regulations and file for permission from the government beforehand. It is truly outrageous to think that the power of the Taiwanese government can be ignored in such a ridiculous manner.
Under the circumstances, the so-called "Ching Kung" campaign comes just in time. It is hoped that the government can show its determination and decisiveness for a change and safeguard the interests of Taiwan. Unfortunately, the campaign is to last only for one week. One cannot help but think that this will only mean things will be back to normal afterwards.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS