In a conference to mark the establishment of the Democratic Pacific Union (DPU), President Chen Shui-bian (
He spoke of the traditional concerns of regional security from a global perspective, saying that nobody wanted to see the collapse of China, as the international community would have to pay a heavy price if this happened.
Amid the flood of loud contention over the issue of independence versus unification, the writer of Chen's speech managed to take a global and integrated perspective of regional security that encompassed the issues of China's rapid economic growth, the stability of its society and beneficial development in considering the future of the Asia-Pacific region.
With economic and strategic conflicts in the Western Pacific between China, the US and Japan increasing, if Chen actually means what he said in this speech, then he may actually be suggesting a viable way out of the cross-strait impasse.
Chen's speech combined both realism and idealism. We heard no more cliches about the need for the collapse of China. He broached the idea of political and social stabilizing mechanisms, as well military expansionism, as major variables that will influence China's peaceful rise.
If we follow the logic of the speech, we can see how the need to cope with China's military expansionism can be addressed simultaneously with the need for more flexibility on the question of direct links. After all, the military threat from China and the lure of its economy are objective realities in Taiwan today.
In terms of idealism, the speech regarded China's attitude toward a peaceful awakening and democratic development as being the key to solving the problem. These are not merely universal ideals, but must also be actualized through action.
The day before this speech, Chen gave another address for the World Taiwanese Congress (WTC), in which he quoted the final two lines of the Chinese poet Li Bai's (
Not everyone would agree that the "boat" had really passed through the 10,000 mountains, but the Taiwanese people have indeed all experienced the dangerous journey "through the Yangtze gorges." The question is how to make the Chinese also understand that this "road to democracy and autonomy," with all the dangers it entails, is necessary?
If making them believe this is the immutable mission of the DPU, how is Taiwan, one of the union's founders, going to fulfill this responsibility?
Around the time of the 1989 Tiananmen Massacre, Taiwan's government and people were keeping a watchful eye on the development of democracy in China, but its support has waned in the intervening time. Supporting democracy in China brings repercussions in the form of pressure from Beijing, but Taiwan has never shirked paying the price for advancing democracy. The presence in Taiwan of Yan Peng (
Two common democratic movement activists last year escaped from China to Taiwan to seek political asylum. At the beginning, they were treated the same as other illegal immigrants and taken to the Chinglu Detention Center in Ilan. An appeal by the Taiwan Association for Human Rights' (TAHR) was rejected after the court ruled that determining whether the two qualified for refugee status, and whether they could be granted political asylum, was a decision for the Cabinet.
As Taiwan does not have an asylum law, there is no legal basis for determining refugee status, so the administration was unable to rule on this matter either. It seems that Taiwan still exists in the world of 20 or 30 years ago. The government apparently believes that the country is still in need of protection, and so has never actively engaged the issues of international human rights outside its own borders. It is no wonder that we have never thought to draft a asylum law for the protection of refugees.
As a result of pressure from the international community and Taiwan-based human-rights groups, the government finally managed to "clandestinely" release the two Chinese asylum seekers on the condition that a non-government agency acted as guarantor. Now the government is trying to find a country that is willing to accept the two men.
Chen has criticized China on numerous occasion in the past, and we hope that his recent speech to the DPU meeting was neither an attempt to please a specific audience or another pretext to weasel out of facing up to China.
If China is to move toward the establishment of democracy and peace, Taiwan must also act. It must not simply take pride in its economic and democratic achievements, while failing to have the confidence to promote peace and democracy at an international level.
The plight of the two refugees should make Taiwanese reflect on one question: If we want to play an active role in realizing international democracy and peace, what are our responsibilities and what price must we be prepared to pay?
Are all Taiwanese prepared to take on such a mission?
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Paul Cooper and Lin Ya-ti
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS