In a conference to mark the establishment of the Democratic Pacific Union (DPU), President Chen Shui-bian (
He spoke of the traditional concerns of regional security from a global perspective, saying that nobody wanted to see the collapse of China, as the international community would have to pay a heavy price if this happened.
Amid the flood of loud contention over the issue of independence versus unification, the writer of Chen's speech managed to take a global and integrated perspective of regional security that encompassed the issues of China's rapid economic growth, the stability of its society and beneficial development in considering the future of the Asia-Pacific region.
With economic and strategic conflicts in the Western Pacific between China, the US and Japan increasing, if Chen actually means what he said in this speech, then he may actually be suggesting a viable way out of the cross-strait impasse.
Chen's speech combined both realism and idealism. We heard no more cliches about the need for the collapse of China. He broached the idea of political and social stabilizing mechanisms, as well military expansionism, as major variables that will influence China's peaceful rise.
If we follow the logic of the speech, we can see how the need to cope with China's military expansionism can be addressed simultaneously with the need for more flexibility on the question of direct links. After all, the military threat from China and the lure of its economy are objective realities in Taiwan today.
In terms of idealism, the speech regarded China's attitude toward a peaceful awakening and democratic development as being the key to solving the problem. These are not merely universal ideals, but must also be actualized through action.
The day before this speech, Chen gave another address for the World Taiwanese Congress (WTC), in which he quoted the final two lines of the Chinese poet Li Bai's (
Not everyone would agree that the "boat" had really passed through the 10,000 mountains, but the Taiwanese people have indeed all experienced the dangerous journey "through the Yangtze gorges." The question is how to make the Chinese also understand that this "road to democracy and autonomy," with all the dangers it entails, is necessary?
If making them believe this is the immutable mission of the DPU, how is Taiwan, one of the union's founders, going to fulfill this responsibility?
Around the time of the 1989 Tiananmen Massacre, Taiwan's government and people were keeping a watchful eye on the development of democracy in China, but its support has waned in the intervening time. Supporting democracy in China brings repercussions in the form of pressure from Beijing, but Taiwan has never shirked paying the price for advancing democracy. The presence in Taiwan of Yan Peng (
Two common democratic movement activists last year escaped from China to Taiwan to seek political asylum. At the beginning, they were treated the same as other illegal immigrants and taken to the Chinglu Detention Center in Ilan. An appeal by the Taiwan Association for Human Rights' (TAHR) was rejected after the court ruled that determining whether the two qualified for refugee status, and whether they could be granted political asylum, was a decision for the Cabinet.
As Taiwan does not have an asylum law, there is no legal basis for determining refugee status, so the administration was unable to rule on this matter either. It seems that Taiwan still exists in the world of 20 or 30 years ago. The government apparently believes that the country is still in need of protection, and so has never actively engaged the issues of international human rights outside its own borders. It is no wonder that we have never thought to draft a asylum law for the protection of refugees.
As a result of pressure from the international community and Taiwan-based human-rights groups, the government finally managed to "clandestinely" release the two Chinese asylum seekers on the condition that a non-government agency acted as guarantor. Now the government is trying to find a country that is willing to accept the two men.
Chen has criticized China on numerous occasion in the past, and we hope that his recent speech to the DPU meeting was neither an attempt to please a specific audience or another pretext to weasel out of facing up to China.
If China is to move toward the establishment of democracy and peace, Taiwan must also act. It must not simply take pride in its economic and democratic achievements, while failing to have the confidence to promote peace and democracy at an international level.
The plight of the two refugees should make Taiwanese reflect on one question: If we want to play an active role in realizing international democracy and peace, what are our responsibilities and what price must we be prepared to pay?
Are all Taiwanese prepared to take on such a mission?
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Paul Cooper and Lin Ya-ti
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS