Next month President Chen Shui-bian (
He has invited the leaders of the four main political parties, Taipei Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman-elect Ma Ying-jeou (
His purpose in doing this is to achieve a foreign policy consensus among the major political parties to more effectively resist China's attempts to isolate Taiwan diplomatically.
Predictably, the green camp has been eager to fall in with the president's plans, while the blue camp has shown a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Ma has said that he is too busy, while PFP spokesperson Hsieh Kung-ping (
He said that while international diplomacy is important, more immediate questions -- the cross-strait issue, the economy and domestic issues -- are in complete disarray, and the president should give priority to these urgent matters which impinge directly on the lives of the Taiwanese people.
Shu said he fully approved of the president's invitation to opposition leaders to help make diplomatic headway. Su also enthusiastically endorsed the president's move, saying that by inviting opposition leaders, we could show our allies Taiwan's democratic achievements and the unity of the Taiwanese people.
He added that even if the political parties had domestic differences, they should stand together when overseas.
He also scolded Ma, saying that while it was essential to keep abreast of domestic administration, promoting Taiwan's foreign policy was also essential.
What results a joint delegation of Taiwan's political leaders might achieve on the diplomatic front remains to be seen, but this must certainly be recognized as something of a first in international diplomacy and an imaginative attempt by the government to break out of the diplomatic isolation that China seeks to impose on Taiwan.
That the opposition leaders have automatically rejected this offer as a reflex action is disappointing.
We call on the opposition leaders to accept Chen's offer, and put down, even temporarily, their inter-party feuds to work together for Taiwan's interests overseas.
By next month, Ma will have officially taken up his post as KMT chairman, so if he were to accept Chen's offer to visit Central America, this would certainly help establish a new basis of cooperation between the DPP and KMT, and mark a clean break from outgoing KMT Chairman Lien Chan's (連戰) policy of resisting Chen at every opportunity, which has already done so much harm to the country.
Ma's acceptance would offer a ray of hope that Taiwan can achieve political harmony, and would also be an affirmation of Taiwan's determination, encompassing both ruling and opposition parties, to resist China.
Taking a neutral view of the issue based on a will to promote national interests, it would be difficult for opposition leaders to refuse Chen's invitation.
In March this year, China passed the "Anti-Secession" Law which allows its military to use "non-peaceful means" to deal with Taiwan if it does not give in to China's ambition to annex it. Despite the savagery inherent in such a law, the pan-blue leaders refused to participate in demonstrations against it.
Instead, they accepted invitations from Chinese President Hu Jintao (
We cannot help but wonder on what grounds pan-blue leaders -- who are readily prepared to settle their differences with the formerly hated Chinese Communist Party (CCP) -- can refuse to temporarily set aside their differences with the popularly elected Chen and join him in promoting Taiwan's foreign policy.
Intense opposition and diverging opinions exist in all democratic countries, but when it comes to national defense, foreign policy and other matters involving other states, there should be unity and everyone should work with the national interest in mind.
In particular, Ma, who calls himself a reformer, should move forward, away from past intense opposition between the blue and green camps and instead listen directly to grassroots opinion.
Five years after the power transition, the intense inter-party struggle that centers around the dislike between Lien and Soong on the one hand and Chen on the other is once again coming to the fore.
The public is heartily sick of this. But Soong's influence is waning and Lien is about to retire and pass the baton to Ma. If Ma is willing to accept Chen's invitation, there is a real chance that we could see an end to inter-party hatred, resolve the political deadlock and put an end to the public's nightmare.
Translated by Perry Svensson and Ian Bartholomew
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US