There's little surprise in the latest white paper from Japan's defense agency. The report, which was approved by Japan's Cabinet Tuesday, is similar to the annual report on China's military buildup published by the US Department of Defense. Although each is based on its own country's observations and evaluations, the two reports clearly agree on one thing: China's military power is growing rapidly, and that growth has started to make many countries uneasy.
On Feb. 19, the US-Japan Security Consultative Committee, a deputy-ministerial-level security forum, listed stability in the Taiwan Strait as a "common strategic objective" for the two countries. Meanwhile, both country's white papers pay special attention to the cross-strait military situation. The US believes that the military balance is tipping in China's favor due to its rapid military expansion in recent years. But the Pentagon says that China still lacks the confidence and capability to carry out a large-scale amphibious assault. Although Taiwan is numerically inferior to China in terms of its weapons, the island enjoys a qualitative advantage. But this advantage is gradually eroding. Japan points out that China's military strength will surpass Taiwan's next year, when the balance of power is expected to change dramatically.
Geographically, the US is safely distant from China. Washington also needs Beijing's cooperation regarding its war on terror and the six-party talks with North Korea. Therefore, US arguments for and against China balance each other out. But as a close neighbor of China, Japan's anxiety is much greater.
The rapid expansion of China's submarine fleet and its arsenal of ballistic missiles has caused Japan considerable anxiety. China's anti-Japanese riots this April, provoked by the controversy over Japanese history textbooks and visits to the Yasukuni Shrine, have made Japan more sensitive to China's feelings of enmity. Relations have been further aggravated by sovereignty disputes over maritime territories near the Diaoyutais (釣魚台) and friction over gas and oil rights in the East China Sea. In this situation, calls by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) for constitutional amendments to create a full-fledged army to replace Japan's Self-Defense Force and upgrade the Japan Defense Agency to full ministerial level appear to be warranted.
People's Liberation Army General Zhu Chenghu (
China has the military capability and will to protect its strategic interests. In the face of such threats, the best policy is to prepare a defensive strategy. The US-Japan security agreements have already established a security framework for east Asia. Strategic considerations have led to Taiwan being incorporated into this framework. Mechanisms for intelligence and military cooperation, combined missile defense and other matters have been established to ensure security in the Taiwan Strait and the East China Sea.
But even after this security network is in place, Taiwan must still recognize the cross-strait military imbalance. A consensus on national security must be reached and military preparations made. If Taiwan does nothing to bolster its defenses and continues to delay the passage of the arms procurement bill, then it could become the weak link in the security chain preventing China's military expansion into the Pacific.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS