US President George W. Bush's appointment of UN critic John Bolton to be US ambassador to the world organization was an in-your-face gesture, to Congress and to the global community.
It comes at a sensitive time on Capitol Hill, where Bush needs the support of senators for his nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court.
Internationally, it comes during a new round of fragile six-nation talks in Beijing aimed at persuading North Korea to abandon its nuclear ambitions. Bolton's depiction in 2003 of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il as a tyrant contributed to Pyongyang's boycotting of an earlier round of talks.
Bolton was undersecretary of state at the time.
The new ambassador arrived in New York on Monday with built-in handicaps. He lacks the stature that comes with Senate approval. And he starts out as a lame duck, allowed to serve only until January 2007 under terms of the constitutional provision Bush invoked to install him.
But the job and the times were too important to wait, Bush said as he used his authority to make appointments during a congressional recess, bypassing the Senate.
Nearly all presidents have used this power, usually to fill minor posts although president Dwight Eisenhower initially filled three Supreme Court vacancies this way.
In Bolton's case, Republicans blamed partisan politics for Democratic delaying tactics that blocked the nominee, noting a majority of the Republican-run chamber supported him. Democratic leaders blamed the White House for failing to release documents they said were important for the Senate's consideration.
Bush, displaying his own streak of stubbornness, refused to back down.
Dispatching Bolton, a conservative who has been repeatedly critical of the UN in the past, to claim the US seat in the world body was confrontational on its face.
"John Bolton is a walking diplomatic time bomb and he's proved that over his career. The fact that he could not get confirmed by the Senate tells the rest of the world this isn't the best we could do," said Robert Boorstin, who served on the National Security Council in president Bill Clinton's administration.
"What will be noticed is the contrast between Bolton and Jack Danforth, who was a tremendously good UN ambassador at a very, very difficult time," said Boorstin.
The post had been vacant since Danforth, a Republican and former senator from Missouri, retired in January.
Next month, the UN is expected to consider a wide-ranging series of reforms, and administration officials said it was important to have Bolton on the job before then.
The organization is wrestling with several proposals to expand the permanent membership of the Security Council from its current five. White House spokesman Scott McClellan said no US decision on expansion has yet been made -- other than for Japan to get a seat.
In a small ceremony at the White House, Bush said Bolton would "defend our nation's interests with character and resolve."
"He will speak for me on critical issues facing the international community," Bush added.
In what was seen by some as a signal that Bolton would be on a short leash, both Bush and the new ambassador emphasized that he would serve under Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who looked on approvingly.
At the Capitol, Bush's use of the recess-appointment authority for a nominee who had failed to win Senate confirmation was sure to raise the ire of senators, who take their "advice and consent" role seriously -- particularly members of the opposition party. And it did.
Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada called the appointment "the latest abuse of power by the Bush White House" and said that Bolton takes the post "with a cloud hanging over his head."
Some Republicans weren't too happy, either, although they generally said they understood Bush's rationale.
"I understand why the president had to do this," said Senator George Allen of Virginia, adding: "I think it's unfortunate that he had to use this option."
Observers in both parties saw the move as a signal that Bush now feels confident he has the votes for Roberts' confirmation when the Senate returns from its August recess, suggesting he might not have been as brazen otherwise.
Some of the issues in the Supreme Court debate also marked the Bolton controversy, namely the White House refusal to release certain records sought by Democrats.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past