Ever since Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
According to Article 3 of the "Nomination Regulations Governing the KMT's Rank and File Intending to Run for Public Office," the KMT's Central Committee has the right to decide who can represent the party in the presidential race based on the outcome of a rank-and-file vote (50 percent) and on a public opinion survey (50 percent).
One of the regulations also stipulates that, if necessary, the party can nominate a non-KMT member as a vice presidential candidate. Since Ma garnered 71.51 percent of the vote in the chairmanship election, few will be able to challenge his bid if he decides to contest for the party's presidential candidate in 2007. As for public opinion, Ma shouldn't have much trouble there either.
Who is qualified to be the party's vice presidential candidate? Ma will very probably select a respected pan-blue Hoklo politician from central or southern Taiwan as his running mate. Whether the vice presidential candidate has local grassroots support may not be a primary consideration, in view of the format of the presidential election.
According to the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) Articles for Nominating Candidates for Public Office, support of the rank and file (30 percent) and the result of a public opinion survey (70 percent) are the two major elements used to decide who can become the party's presidential and vice presidential candidates. Under this nomination system, the more charismatic a candidate is, the more likely it is that he or she will come out ahead.
When the DPP nominated its presidential candidate in 1999, the public opinion survey greatly outweighed the evaluation of the candidates conducted by the DPP's rank-and-file and cadre members. Thus, I believe that in 2007, if the nomination mechanism remains in place, the overall popularity of both the DPP's and the KMT 's presidential candidates will dictate whether he or she will be nominated by the party. Under these circumstances, candidates who enjoy the greatest popularity will be able to win the backing of the party elite.
Additionally, the seventh legislative elections, which will precede the 2008 presidential election, are also going to be crucial as the "single-member district, two-vote system" will be adopted for the first time. As such, the presidential hopefuls are likely to get out and stump for the legislative candidates to test the waters. At that point, it will be difficult to tell whether they are canvassing support for themselves or for the legislative candidates.
More importantly, the party that gains the majority of seats in the legislative elections will get a boost in the presidential elections that follow -- meaning that the fate of the presidential candidates will be closely related to the outcome of the legislative elections.
In short, both the green and blue camps are likely to establish a nominating mechanism that allows public opinion surveys to play a more important role in selecting their presidential candidates. These types of measures are unique to the development of democracy in Taiwan and, with this kind of nomination system, we can already get a clear idea what kind of presidential candidates we are likely to get.
Wang Yeh-li is a professor in the department of political science at Tunghai University.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS