Quite a controversy has erupted within these pages over Richard Hartzell's recent interpretations of Taiwan's legal status as defined by international law ("Recover Taiwan's post-war position" July 15, page 8). As a humble citizen of Taiwan, I feel deeply honored and deeply grateful for the attention and concern of so many people for my oppressed country.
However, international law is not going to help Taiwan. It will not stop China's ambitions. International law will not cause the US to begin a military occupation of Taiwan. And international law will not quell the incessant petty squabbling among Taiwanese politicians.
Worse, according to Hartzell's interpretation, Taiwan should be under the military occupation of the US. What if academics in Beijing came up with the same conclusion? This would provide the People's Liberation Army hawks with a nice excuse to "liberate those comrades in Taiwan to save them from the yoke of US imperialism and occupation," a scenario I would not exactly relish.
In the past, international law failed to prevent World War I and World War II from happening, because no law and no treaty could restrain the crazy, irrational ambitions of the Kaiser, Hitler, Mussolini and all the rest. China has crazy, irrational ambitions, as evidenced by its expanding military, its barbaric behavior toward other delegates at international conferences and its desire to nuke innocent US cities.
Hopefully, Taiwan's fate will be resolved by the rational, collective decision of its 23 million citizens. Such a result would, I think, carry more weight with the international community than any law or treaty. It might also make China think twice about taking on a united nation and the overwhelming support of international public opinion.
Bert Chen
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with