On Friday, President Chen Shui-bian (
In recent months, it has been discovered that in an increasing numbers of criminal cases -- ranging from kidnappings to violent assaults and even murder -- illegal Chinese immigrants were the hired guns.
Several reasons explain this increasingly serious phenomenon. For one, the price of hiring Chinese assailants is quite inexpensive -- reportedly around NT$200,000 for each person per crime. Also, it is quite easy for these assailants to escape punishment since they can be easily smuggled out of Taiwan in the same way that most of them were, in fact, smuggled in. Moreover, because they are strangers to Taiwan it is very difficult to identify them. Nobody can identify them visually, and they usually have neither criminal records nor fingerprints on file here in Taiwan.
Many of these Chinese hit men who have been caught have been found to be former members of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) or the Chinese "police." As such they are often very well trained and come with powerful arms illegally purchased and smuggled from the other side of the Taiwan Strait. Cheap, efficient and hard to trace, no wonder they are in demand.
At the supply end, there are plenty of illegal Chinese immigrants who will succumb to the temptation of the money they could earn from such criminal conduct. Some are illegal immigrants who were smuggled into Taiwan initially in the hope of finding legal work and earning some money. However, most of them find out that it is not that easy to make a quick buck in Taiwan, at least not through legal means. On top of this, there are, of course, those who have been smuggled into Taiwan for a short period for the sole purpose of perpetrating crimes for which they were hired to commit.
According to the police, these Chinese hit men typically work alone or in small groups. However, there are increasing signs that Chinese and Taiwanese organized criminal gangs are becoming involved. This phenomenon explains why there is an apparent trend to reverse the serious imbalance in the numbers of female and male Chinese illegal immigrants in Taiwan. Up until fairly recently, the number of female illegal immigrants from China far outnumbered the male immigrants -- the ratio used to be about 8:1, according to government statistics. The female illegals often came to Taiwan through bogus marriages with Taiwanese men in order to make quick money through prostitution. While this has also led to social and criminal problems, those caused by the influx of Chinese hit men hired by Taiwanese gangs threaten to be far more serious.
As indicated by Chen, there should be no discrimination against Chinese immigrants who enter Taiwan legally and the government should protect their rights. But illegal immigration brings a host of problems in its wake, crime being just one of them. This is, of course, because illegal immigrants are typically a highly marginalized group in society with little chance of elevating, or in many cases even just regularizing, their social and economic status. Many of them resort to crime. Given their shadowy existence, they are also one of the most difficult groups to effectively police.
In the early 1980s, illegal Chinese immigrants were also at the center of criminal and social problems in Hong Kong. Unless the government takes immediate and effective measures to deal with these problems, Taiwan will most certainly go down the path of Hong Kong in this regard.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS