The stronger the pursuit of commercial interests is for Taiwanese broadcasters, the more garbage is thrown at consumers. Today, our news broadcasts cover sensational stories and pieces on the private lives of celebrities. Broadcasters compete with one another for stories such as an entertainer receiving a big diamond ring or having an affair. As I witness the bizarre sensationalism of our news programs, I can't help but wonder, "What have entertainers' private lives got to do with me?"
It is not that entertainment news should not be reported. But the media should at least take the proportion and the principle of public welfare into consideration, and balance the coverage with all kinds of news. Today, the most serious problem of Taiwan's television news is the the lack of international news.
Except for major incidents such as the terrorist attacks in London, we seldom see world news on TV. As a result, it is impossible for us to receive information on global affairs from domestic news stations, with the exception of the Public Television Service (PTS).
How many of us have watched detailed news reports on the referendums on the EU constitution? How many are aware of the recent development in the Middle East, or the political crisis in the Philippines? Broadcasters shouldn't be trying to make everyone an expert on international affairs, but it should be held responsible for depriving the Taiwanese people of basic information about international affairs.
In 1957, famous Japanese commentator Oya Soichi criticized TV as the "intellectual scourge of 100 million Japanese," attacking the local media for repeatedly delivering vulgar messages to their viewers at that time. His criticism once caused a strong response from Japan's society. Looking back at the phenomenon in Taiwan, what hides behind our media is in fact a childishness, and a society that tends to look away from reality.
This social trend is pushing Taiwan toward a kind of "de-internationalization." We often hear the opposition parties criticizing Taiwan for being a so-called "closed country." But nobody has blamed the media for causing this problem.
We still remember that when President Chen Shui-bian (
Chang Bao-yuan is an organizer of the Hand-in-Hand to Safeguard Taiwan Alliance.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers