Recently, some media and elected representatives severely criticized certain newly-built or planned cultural facilities. I personally think that such criticism misses the point.
Take for example the cultural centers in Hsinchu and Changhua counties. Both used to be old, decrepit buildings. The Hsinchu center was a half-completed farmers' center built more than 10 years ago by the local government with NT$80 million. It had been abandoned for many years, and was a mockery of the government's performance.
To clean up the whole mess, the Ministry of Economic Affairs created a budget to remodel the center into a tourist spot. Today, the Hsinchu County Government is reluctant to outsource the center, and plans to run it directly.
As for the Changhua center, it is a historic spot that used to be a barn. Thanks to the famous architect Jay Chiu's (邱文傑) design, the building is now a masterpiece. Before long, this cultural venue in Lugang Township will probably be bought out by business interests.
These problems are nothing new. Many people insist that we must have the "software" before investing in the "hardware" in regard to the construction of cultural facilities. They regard these new culture centers as "housing for mosquitos."
But most of these people are completely unaware of the actual situation regarding the development of Taiwan's cultural facilities.
All arts and cultural groups know how difficult it is to get into the National Theater or Concert Hall. Often painters have to fight for decent exhibition space, and otherwise have to make do with outdoor activities. And because they usually perform so many functions, county cultural centers are usually all booked up.
About 80 percent of these facilities were built during the late former president Chiang Ching-kuo's (蔣經國) administration almost 30 years ago.
At that time, they, too, were criticized as homes for mosquitoes. If the building of venues should follow demand -- hardware following software -- then Taiwan's cultural facilities would have been inadequate.
After having invested in highways, a subway system, railways, seaports, airports, and industrial complexes, Taiwan should now put its public resources into the construction of local cultural centers, township and community arts and cultural facilities, and even international exhibition and performance halls.
But such calls often face unreasonable opposition. I am worried that if we do not start now, it will become more and more difficult in the future. If the government did not make the decision almost three decades ago, we might never have found the land suitable for the National Theater and Concert Hall and local cultural centers. Thus, the development of Taiwan's culture cannot simply depend on idle talk.
In fact, it is more correct to say that the existence of hardware provides a boost for the development of software content. With such space and facilities, people have a greater chance to approach arts and culture, while creators and performers have a greater chance to give full play to their talent. That being so, the audience for arts and cultural activities will naturally grow, and these people will support more activities.
Such space and facilities are the soil necessary for the growth of arts and culture. Otherwise, where would arts and culture grow? They are just like our sports facilities. We cannot delay the construction of baseball fields until Taiwan's baseball team wins the world championship, or gymnasiums until our athletes win Olympic gold medals.
Similarly, we cannot delay the construction of arts and cultural facilities until after audiences have increased.
The quantity and quality of the arts and cultural facilities in Japan, Europe, and the US is good. A small town of less than 100,000 people may have a number of facilities, including music halls, theaters and museums.
There are over 10 world-class museums in Berlin alone.
We must understand that arts and cultural creation and appreciation, as well as society's cultural vitality, mainly depends on the public's initiative and local citizens' participation.
Chen Chi-nan is the chairman of the Council for Cultural Affairs.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth