A people who have suffered under long-term oppression at the hands of a foreign power often begin to see themselves as second-class citizens, and feel subservient to their foreign political leaders. In severe cases this can come to resemble what is known as Stockholm Syndrome, where the people actually recognize the legitimacy of the oppressors, start to pander to them and feel the need to please them. After a while, they start to feel at ease in their new reality, and are even content when shown small acts of generosity.
Over the past few months, the foreign Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has been holding its chairmanship contest, and the competition between the two candidates, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), egged on by the media, has been getting more and more heated.
Now, this is their own affair, but Wang, who was born and raised in Taiwan, has been pulling out all the stops in his criticism and misrepresentation of former president Lee Teng-hui's (
To improve his chances of winning the chairmanship, Wang even went to Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall and swore before the bronze bust there that he opposed Taiwanese independence. This was simply pandering to the Mainlander elements within the party, in a bid to secure more votes for his candidacy.
When he was still alive, Sun Yat-sen (
Wang is trying to draw an ideological line between himself and Lee. He has clearly abandoned any idea of autonomy for the Taiwanese people. He opposes the idea of rectifying Taiwan's name in favor of maintaining the false name of the Republic of China (ROC). But does this really offer any guarantee that China will refrain from using military force against Taiwan?
Wang is opposed to the rectification of Taiwan's name, he is against writing a new constitution and he rejects the idea of Taiwanese independence -- and yet he shows no objection to the barbaric legislation that is China's "Anti-Secession" Law. Could it really be that Wang wants to follow in the footsteps of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and allow China to swallow up Taiwan by colluding with the communists against the pro-independence parties?
If Taiwan is not an independent nation, how does one explain the existence of the legislature? Why not downgrade it to the status of a legislative council? In fact, why not lower the status of Wang himself, as he is really only the speaker of the legislative council of a special region.
If Wang opposes the idea that Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation, how can he commandeer a warship to protect our fishing rights? And what of Taiwan's international status?
Wang is the speaker of the legislature, yet he betrays an ignorance of politics and fails to recognize Taiwan as a nation in its own right. Again, it's no wonder that the legislature is sinking further and further into the mire as time goes on.
Right before our eyes, Taiwanese politicians within the pan-blue camp show they are willing to be second-class figures, hold back from speaking their minds and let themselves become Sinicized. They are turning into two-faced people whose words reflect what is expedient depending on the circumstances they are in.
A people governed by a foreign power often harbor a sense of guilt and are afraid of offending their oppressors. This self-abasement has been manifested in the recent pandering to Beijing's talk of peace by these Taiwanese politicians, who are suppressing their own sense of national identity. Such politicians are in desperate need of help to correct the distorted way in which they see things. It's up to Taiwanese who see things more clearly to save them.
William J.K. Lo is secretary-general of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS