On July 2, the Live 8 concerts took place in nine countries and 10 cities across four continents under the banner of "Make Poverty History." They were timed to precede the three-day Group of Eight Summit held from July 6 to July 8 at the Gleneagles Hotel in Perthshire, Scotland.
The previous Live Aid concert was held in 1985. The organizers regarded the contribution of financial aid to African nations as a show of compassion. In the 20 years since, huge sums of money have flowed into Africa. But not only have such funds failed to improve the quality of life of the people there, but these African countries remain mired in debt. At UN meetings, their incessant demand is for debt relief.
The recent G8 summit was a prelude to Western nations honoring their commitment to write off such debts. British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the summit's host, challenged the rest of the G8 countries to double aid to Africa from the current total of US$25 billion to US$50 billion by 2010. In the end, US President George W. Bush and the leaders of seven other major industrialized nations pledged to double the amount of aid for Africa over five years and substantially raise it for other poor countries. Additionally, the World Bank, the African Development Bank and the IMF all agreed to offer annual debt relief worth US$2 billion to the world's poorest nations.
But at the same time, each of the G8 nations also asked for something in return. The US, for example, demanded that aid recipient nations should privatize state-owned businesses and purchase US services and products, the IMF and the World Bank demanded that aid recipients should meet strict free-market regulations, and Germany and Italy emphasized the importance of building a fully-established support system to clearly demarcate the scope of such aid. On poverty reduction, a deal was hammered out by G8 nations prior to the summit to forgive the debt of 18 nations, 14 of them in Africa.
One reason why today's African nations remain poor is because of their inefficient governments. Therefore, no matter how much aid they receive, very rarely will the money go to the impoverished people because of the prevalence of government corruption.
The cancellation of the debts of the most heavily indebted poor countries should not be unconditional. Instead, the aid should be received by local, impartial non-governmental organizations responsible for building houses, providing agricultural cultivation techniques, establishing schools, as well as providing education and other tasks like distributing food to households. Only in this way can the benefits of aid be enjoyed by the poor.
The demand made by the IMF, the World Bank and the African Development Bank is the most unreasonable since these poverty-stricken nations do not have any concept of how to develop their own industries, let alone operate within a free-market environment. The US demand is also far-fetched, given the low income levels in these poor nations. How could they have the money to purchase services and products from these developed countries?
Many impoverished African villages have abundant land for the cultivation of crops. It could at least be used to make these villages self-sufficient in terms of food.
Therefore, agricultural teams, like the ones from Taiwan, that can provide African nations with agricultural cultivation techniques, are the primary step to stop poverty in Africa. Many unemployed adults should enter the work force in labor intensive manufacturing.
Other important practical measures to change African nations' low living standards are to provide loans to small- and medium-size businesses to invigorate local business development and establish incentive policies to introduce direct foreign investment.
As to industries and enterprises that can benefit poor African nations, many have already been built up in China, India and Southeast Asian nations. Therefore, the World Bank, the IMF and G8 nations should work on ways to use tax incentives to persuade international enterprises to invest in Africa based on the motivation of humanitarian assistance.
It is too early to talk about free markets without first forming agricultural, industrial, and trade systems in each of these poor nations. A simple system of barter or labor in exchange for goods is probably more appropriate to Africa's current needs.
The spirit of the Live 8 concerts is to lead a historic effort for compassion and justice. I hope after the closing of the G8 summit, this spirit can be realized.
Chiu Chen Lee-in is a research fellow at the Chung-hua Institution for Economic Research.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past