The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) held a televised campaign presentation last Saturday as part of the run-up to its chairmanship election. Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) spent about an hour attacking the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and expressing their views. But for issues that are truly relevant to the election, only the party's assets and the ethnic issue were mentioned.
For the KMT's party assets, Ma suggested respecting the judiciary, while Wang suggested protecting the assets with the blue camp's majority in the legislature. As for the ethnic issue, Ma said that he was conceived in Taiwan, delivered in Hong Kong and raised back in Taiwan. Therefore, if he won the chairmanship, the KMT would not become a party only for Mainlanders. Wang said that he opposed ethnic divisions and accused the DPP of aggravating the ethnic divide.
On the surface, Wang enjoys an advantage since he is backed by most of the blue camp's legislators and the KMT's Central Standing Committee members, who have numerous "vote captains" across the nation. He also claims to respect KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰), saying that he would not have run for the post if Lien ran for re-election. But Ma has not shown unwavering support for Lien or protecting the party's assets. Obviously, it was natural for Lien to ally himself with Wang.
Most importantly, if Wang is elected, he will be willing to take over everything passed on to him by Lien. As for Ma, who has a "Teflon man" reputation, it is hard to predict whether he would do so. The KMT does not have a healthy internal accounting system. Even a god could not figure out the details of its accounts. Under such circumstances, Lien would certainly prefer Wang to Ma. His secret assistance to Wang through party affairs can be expected.
Indeed, lawmakers and Central Standing Committee members have many vote captains. But whether they will help Wang is questionable, because it is difficult to transfer their support to him. The power of Lien's administrative system is also questionable, as it is difficult to force party members to vote for Wang. Thus, the key lies in the factors that truly influence the election results -- the ethnic issue and the candidates' images.
Although Lien is a banshan, (Taiwanese with mainland background), he has been supported by the Mainlanders, leading Wang to believe that he will also gain their support by strictly following Lien's line. But their situations are quite different. The Mainlanders are clear that after the democratization of Taiwan, they may lose their power if they do not "use the Taiwanese to restrain the Taiwanese," and Lien is their best tool. From his appointment as chairman in 2000 to last year's presidential election, they consolidated themselves to support Lien.
But the Mainlanders only support Lien when there is no competition from other Mainlanders. The 2000 presidential election was an example of this. At that time, almost all Mainlander leaders supported Lien while grass-roots Mainlanders supported James Soong (宋楚瑜) -- because Soong is a "pure" Mainlander, and Lien is only half.
Wang is facing the same problem today. If no candidate has close Mainlander ties, then he can win their support. But since Ma does, it is impossible for Wang to gain the Mainlanders' support.
The Taiwanese people are able to support Mainlander candidates. But only a few Mainlanders are able to support Taiwanese candidates. Obviously, the July 16 election will be unfavorable to Wang, unless Taiwanese can generate a sense of crisis in the face of the united Mainlanders.
Chen Mao-hsiung is a professor in the department of electrical engineering at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past