Gavin Phipps' story on Orchid Island ("Orchid Island spoils the visitor in need of a break," June 29, page 13) is unfortunately filled with many stereotypes and misunderstandings outsiders have about the Tao people (or "Yami" -- the name that was arbitrarily given to them by Japanese anthropologists).
The Tao are a peaceful, ocean-going people with strong linguistic and cultural ties to the Batan Islands of the northern Philippines. There is no credible evidence backing Phipps' condescending assertion that the Tao tribe "made its living raiding villages and breaking heads in Taiwan as well as in China's Fujian Province."
Until their first contact with Dutch colonists in the early 17th century, the Tao's interaction with outsiders was based primarily on peaceful trade with people in the Batans and the Amis tribe of eastern Taiwan. While the occasional inter-village skirmish did occur on the island, the Tao were primarily concerned with fishing, taro farming and adhering to a strict code of social taboos that maintained cohesion within the tribe.
Phipps' assertion that the Tao took part in raids on the Fujian coast can also be taken as further evidence of the common confusion many casual observers encounter when differentiating between Taiwan's Aboriginal tribes. While there are accounts of warriors from the southwestern Siraya plains tribe going on raids across the Taiwan Strait before the Dutch era, such stories are merely anecdotal and tend to reinforce the stereotypical view that prior to their subjugation by the Han people, Taiwan's Aborigines were violence-prone savages.
The Tao people are an invaluable link to Taiwan's pre-Han Pacific heritage, a link that fades a little bit every day thanks to Han chauvinism and environmental pollution. As a vocal supporter of native Taiwanese culture, the Taipei Times has an obligation to both its readers around the world and to its fellow citizens to portray all groups of Taiwanese accurately and objectively, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant their number may be.
Jason Wright
Andrew Kerslake
Washington
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
RSS