Gavin Phipps' story on Orchid Island ("Orchid Island spoils the visitor in need of a break," June 29, page 13) is unfortunately filled with many stereotypes and misunderstandings outsiders have about the Tao people (or "Yami" -- the name that was arbitrarily given to them by Japanese anthropologists).
The Tao are a peaceful, ocean-going people with strong linguistic and cultural ties to the Batan Islands of the northern Philippines. There is no credible evidence backing Phipps' condescending assertion that the Tao tribe "made its living raiding villages and breaking heads in Taiwan as well as in China's Fujian Province."
Until their first contact with Dutch colonists in the early 17th century, the Tao's interaction with outsiders was based primarily on peaceful trade with people in the Batans and the Amis tribe of eastern Taiwan. While the occasional inter-village skirmish did occur on the island, the Tao were primarily concerned with fishing, taro farming and adhering to a strict code of social taboos that maintained cohesion within the tribe.
Phipps' assertion that the Tao took part in raids on the Fujian coast can also be taken as further evidence of the common confusion many casual observers encounter when differentiating between Taiwan's Aboriginal tribes. While there are accounts of warriors from the southwestern Siraya plains tribe going on raids across the Taiwan Strait before the Dutch era, such stories are merely anecdotal and tend to reinforce the stereotypical view that prior to their subjugation by the Han people, Taiwan's Aborigines were violence-prone savages.
The Tao people are an invaluable link to Taiwan's pre-Han Pacific heritage, a link that fades a little bit every day thanks to Han chauvinism and environmental pollution. As a vocal supporter of native Taiwanese culture, the Taipei Times has an obligation to both its readers around the world and to its fellow citizens to portray all groups of Taiwanese accurately and objectively, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant their number may be.
Jason Wright
Andrew Kerslake
Washington
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS