London is one of five cities competing to host the 2012 Olympic Games. Since the modern Olympics began in 1896, London has hosted the games twice, in 1908 and 1948. My grandmother was a gymnast and wished to take part in the 1912 games but at that time women were not allowed to compete in this sport. So she and her team had to be content with a demonstration while the games took place in Stockholm. The first ever women's Wimbledon champion was a British lady, Charlotte Cooper, who won gold in Olympic tennis in 1900. Women's participation in gymnastics came later and my grandmother was the Women's team manager at Amsterdam in 1928.
The games now are a vast entertainment spectacular where individual and national hopes rise and fall over a three-week period. The competitors themselves and the games' hosts spend a fortune in time, effort and money in preparation. In the early games, preparation and training were not always necessary or even thought desirable. The games were for individuals, not nations; and for amateurs, not paid professionals. One former British athlete refused to leave his fishing holiday in Norway, preferring to turn up the day before his competition. He won. Such an attitude is unthinkable now.
Cheating in its various forms has been a feature since the beginning. An early candidate in the cross-country race was disqualified for using a motor vehicle for part of his race. Drugs became popular later and now are rigorously sought out and users stripped of their titles and banned. However, technology may be used in other ways -- for example, in running-shoe design, skin-tight swimsuits, special steel in skis and highly complex bows in the archery competition. Whatever the progress on eliminating drugs, the days of pure competition between human bodies have long gone.
Hosting the Olympics is both an honor and a nightmare. On the one hand, the games sometimes mark the progress of a country into the developed world, for example, Seoul in 1988 and Beijing in 2008. On the other hand, they can be a nightmare to stage, such as when terrorists struck in Munich in 1972; or a budgetary nightmare afterwards where the costs are not recovered. In some games, politics intrude to an extraordinary degree, such as the US boycott of the Moscow Olympics in 1980.
Others have been spectacular successes. In the brighter days before Sept. 11 and the war in Iraq, the Olympics in Sydney in 2000 were generally believed to be the best ever in terms of host organization and entertainment. Last year, Athens wisely decided not to follow this example but to cut its cloth more to its country's small size and wealth. Despite all the misgivings over the slow pace of preparation, these too were a success.
The World now has three main entertainment spectacles to choose from: the Olympic Games, Holly- (or Bolly-) wood films and the US presidential elections. In terms of cost, there is not much to choose between them. In terms of worldwide interest they are very similar. The presidential elections, however, outlast the other two in terms of duration, and in terms of the exhaustion of participants and spectators. Of course, you might ask which brings more good to the world? An impossible question, though I suspect that the Olympics tend to produce more prolonged pleasure. I know that my grandmother was proud of her involvement and contribution to the growth of the modern Olympic movement.
I too am involved in the Olympics. Part of my work here, like other British representatives overseas, is to promote -- discreetly and fairly -- the claims of London to host the 2012 Olympics. We want to show why London will be better than the other cities. The London bid uses the theme "Towards a One Planet Olympics." It links the staging of the Olympic Games and the Paralympics in London to the creation of stronger inner city communities through sport, the environment and health. The plans involve low-carbon and zero-waste strategies in a comprehensive approach to tackling climate change issues.
The new Olympic Park and much needed new sporting venues in east London will provide the best possible conditions and facilities for athletes. They include healthy, energy-efficient buildings that will be "climate-proof" to minimize greenhouse emissions.
"Environmental excellence will go hand in hand with sporting performance at the London 2012 Olympic Games," bid chairman and Olympic champion Sebastian Coe has said.
The new Olympic Park will also transform the surrounding east London neighborhoods, which include some of the poorest and most physically deprived areas of the UK. They will become a sustainable new urban quarter for the capital, with sport at its heart, just 10km from central London.
London bid officials worked closely with many environmental and sustainable development organizations and experts from around the world -- in particular the World Wildlife Fund and BioRegional. The plans are regarded by international experts as a model for tackling common inner-city and urban-community problems.
Other cities have their strong points, too. Tomorrow, we shall know which city has won when the International Olympic Committee makes its choice in Singapore. British Prime Minister Tony Blair and football great David Beckham will be there to support London's bid. As in all sporting events, I wish all cities the best of luck.
Derek Marsh is director general of the British Trade and Cultural Office in Taipei.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US