"Lenin's dream is gone / but Pushkin's autumn remains." These two lines from a poem often make me think of a speech Lenin gave in 1922, a few years after the founding of the Soviet Union. He seemed to feel that the revolution had been stifled by bureaucracy and institutional arbitrariness.
The bureacracy of the old system was startling. Despite the revolution, the communist revolutionaries -- who had put an end to the tsarist era -- found it difficult to do more than just talk about transforming government institutions and changing ideology and atmosphere. So how does President Chen Shui-bian (
Having put an end to KMT rule, the political motivation inherited by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) from the tangwai movement proved to be nothing short of revolutionary. Compared to democracy and the transformation towards independence, the longstanding party-state, martial law and a colonial system holding up China as a model were but an empty Chinese shell.
But will the DPP be able to sustain its revolution? It has to deal with both the bureaucratization that follows from being a government and the party-state atmosphere, in a society long controlled by a colonial party-state system.
Discussions of Lenin generally use the words "criticism" and "self-criticism" when describing how the revolutionary Lenin dealt with the discrepancy between ideals and reality. So how do we get around the problem of reality? Lenin even said that "we are disgusted that the state apparatus disappoints us so, with negligence and chaos everywhere." He also wanted to "reform this useless government institution."
But after the founding of the Soviet state, Lenin was unable to fully realize his political ideals, and he died at 54 years of age, not having been able to realize his dream of a "democratic communism." That wasn't entirely his fault, but rather it depended on a pathological political system.
The Taiwanese revolution that put an end to the KMT rule entailed a democratization and a transformation towards independence, but there was no revolutionary who could lead that revolution in the way that Lenin did.
So what about criticism and self-criticism in our political situation? Taking over a Republic of China (ROC) transformed into a party-state, hard work is required to eliminate that party-state.
How will the government bureaucracy deal with Taiwan's democratization and transformation towards independence?
If Taiwan is occupied, who will lead the central and local governments? In other words: Are Chen and the DPP really the formal and spiritual leaders of this country, of Taiwan? Is the nation implied unambiguously a Taiwanese nation? Or is it a nation with identity problems, hi-jacked by a Chinese national consciousness? Maybe we should even ask if this country is still being ruled by the KMT's party-state.
If that revolutionary character really has been lost, do the social conditions for a transformation of the old KMT rule still exist? Politicians are tested by both revolutionary ideals and reality, but this only means that they must not treat politics as a business, but rather as a formal power ritual aimed at building order, justice and security -- and this is a cultural endeavor.
So do Taiwan's politicians treat politics as a business or as a cultural endeavor? Although his political dream is gone, Lenin treated it as a cultural endeavor.
Lee Min-yung is a poet and president of the Taiwan Peace Foundation.
Translated by Perry Svensson
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
“Of course you can choose not to be Taiwanese, just do not stay here,” chairwoman of Taipei 101 operator Taipei Financial Center Corp Janet Chia (賈永婕) said in an online interview with local entertainer Tai Chih-yuan (邰智源), triggering intense discussion on social media, with politicians across party lines weighing in. In the interview, which was aired on May 14, Chia and Tai’s discussion over a meal in Taipei 101 covered Chia’s career change from entertainer to chairwoman and US climber Alex Honnold’s free solo climb up the Taipei 101 building. During the interview, Chia said, “Being on this land, we
RSS