Should Mao Zedong's (毛澤東) huge portrait still hang above the front gate of Tiananmen Square? Should China's ruling party still call itself communist?
These are not idle questions. Unless and until China's leaders answer both questions with a simple "No" they will continue to have blood on their hands and a tainted legitimacy. Many Chinese do not accept communist rule precisely because the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) denies its past, and remains unapologetic about its cruelty.
This is one reason why China has a Taiwan "problem." The Chinese Communists insist that being Chinese means accepting the political reality of a sole communist sovereign. Indeed, many Taiwanese think that, if being Chinese means accepting all that goes under the name of Mao and the CCP, they will gladly deny their "Chineseness" than assume some of that shame.
Similarly, while a recent poll found that 70 percent of Hong Kong's people are proud of being ethnic Chinese, a similar percentage are ashamed of the conduct of the mainland government. Their message to the government in Beijing is this: you cannot take away our ethnicity but you have soiled our dignity through your barbarism. For Hong Kong, the defining symbol of the communist government is the killing of students with abandon on June 4, 1989.
Enshrined in the CCP's Constitution are the following words: Mao Zedong, the party's chief representative, created Mao Zedong Thought, which has been proven correct by practice and based on what the Communist Party developed as the basic system of socialism economically, politically and culturally after the founding of the People's Republic.
But how "correct" was Mao?
In her devastating new book Mao: The Unknown Story, by Jung Chang (
To help finance his communist movement in the 1930s, Mao squeezed poor peasant families with any assets in the "Red" zone he controlled. Many counter-revolutionary families were forced out of their homes to live in buffalo sheds so that their meager assets could be requisitioned. While hiding out in the caves of Yenan, Mao became a distributor of opium. Contrary to myths that he and his insurgents lived frugally during the Yenan days, they lived well on trading profits.
After the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government collapsed in 1949, Mao's "New China" emerged. Almost immediately, he launched another campaign that was intended to suppress "counter-revolutionaries," berating one province for "being too lenient, not killing enough.
Killing "enemies" was not the sole purpose. Mao wanted to instill obedience by having as many people as possible witness the terror. As he put it in 1951, "many places don't dare to kill counter-revolutionaries on a grand scale with big publicity. This situation must be changed.
In Beijing millions of inhabitants were ordered to witness some 30,000 sentencing and execution rallies during the early 1950s. Indeed, in 1950 and 1951 an estimated 3 million people perished by execution, torture, or suicide. Masses of Chinese were sent to work camps, where prisoners endured harsh physical labor to "reform" their "bourgeois" habits and thoughts. In any given year, roughly 10 million such "laborers" existed. During Mao's rule, an estimated 27 million died in the camps.
Close to 38 million people died of starvation and overwork during the infamous Great Leap Forward (1958-1961) to catch up with the West. Mao's reaction?
"With all these projects, half of China may well have to die. If not half, one-third, or one-tenth -- 50 million -- die ? but you can't blame me when people die," he said.
Mao launched the Cultural Revolution (1965-1976) to take revenge against those who opposed his mad programs. Millions more died. Mao also ordered the country to destroy the "Four Olds -- old ideas, old culture, old customs and old habits." As a result, his Red Guards destroyed ancient books, priceless antiques, monuments across the land and nearly all Buddhist monasteries in Tibet.
In all, it is estimated that more than 70 million people died in the "New China" Mao and the present CCP leaders so proudly proclaim as their accomplishment. When Japanese prime minister Kakuei Tanaka went to China in 1974, he bowed deeply to Mao, apologizing for the suffering that invading Japanese had caused. Mao famously said: "No need to apologize. We should thank you instead. Without your invasion, we Communists would not have won."
What about today's "New New China," with its skyscrapers, modern highways and unbridled capitalism? The reality is not as gleaming as it first looks. Annual per capita GDP in Shanghai, China's showcase city, remains, at US$3,000, a small fraction of the levels in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Fifty years of communist misrule have left what was once the most advanced city in Asia a distant also-ran.
China's communist rulers must own up to their history and drop Mao and the communist legacy. The country needs a new constitution, one that enshrines genuine democracy. China's people have long been ready for this.
Maintaining the false label of communism while reviving capitalism and insisting that Mao, for all his mistakes and crimes, was 70 percent "correct" is the bedrock of the moral corruption that afflicts China today. It is as if the Nazis were still in power, with the current leaders claiming that Hitler was only 30 percent wrong. China deserves better; it requires better in order to reclaim the glory that was China.
Shaw Sin-ming was formerly a leading Hong Kong investment fund manager and is now a visiting scholar at Columbia University in New York.
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
There have been media reports that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) plans to hold military exercises in August to simulate seizing the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. In the past, only Coast Guard Administration (CGA) personnel have been stationed there, but the Ministry of National Defense has dispatched the Republic of China Marine Corps to the islands, nominally for “ex-situ training,” to prevent a Chinese attack under the guise of military drills. The move is only a temporary measure and not sufficiently proactive. Instead, the government should officially declare sovereignty over the islands and station troops