Having read Scott Austin's question, "why should they take Taiwan seriously?" (Letter, June 25, page 8), I, being a native Taiwanese who loves my country and would never leave it, have to say something.
First, I admit that what Austin said, "in a country whose very behavior and outlook on life and business explain in simplest terms why the rest of the world doesn't take Taiwan seriously" is partially true.
However, while there are some who don't care for and are disgusted with their country, there are even more who are dedicated to safeguarding this paradise and its people. During the Jun. 12-18 flooding in central and southern Taiwan, the Tzu Chi Buddhist Compassionate Relief Foundation as well as police officers and firefighters tried their best to help victims in the disaster areas. The Tzu Chi foundation also spreads its love wherever disasters and calamities strike, worldwide. Besides this, I would like to tell Austin there are still many unsung heroes and touching stories about people's love for their hometowns. Taiwan, in my opinion, is still the best place in the world to live.
As to upgrading English proficiency, I also agree with Geoffrey Cartridge's assertion that, "Students need to be immersed in English language and culture to learn it effectively" -- that's what the Toastmasters clubs in Taiwan are for. Of the 92 Toastmasters clubs island-wide, two-thirds are English-speaking clubs (including one in Hsinchu and one in Hualien, let alone Taipei). During each meeting, we speak only English from the beginning to the end. We have such programs as a joke section, a prepared speech section, an evaluation section and a Table Topic (an impromptu speech). Toastmasters makes immersion in English language and culture possible. Besides, it is fun and encouraging, too. Members share their life experiences and are encouraged to make mistakes. We all learn by doing.
However, in Toastmasters, English is nothing more than a tool for communication, we don't ask members to speak neutrally accented English; so long as everyone can understand, it is OK.
To be frank, I never agree that English should be taught as a subject; instead it should be taught as a language. I spent a lot of time explaining to my kids why it is important to speak English (I still do) before I taught them English, instead of forcing them to learn English without any reason.
Last but not least, there's always room for improvement, no matter if it is English teaching or learning, Toastmasters promotions or whatever is happening in Taiwan. But I always look on the bright side.
So I also would say "good luck" -- sincerely -- to Austin, no matter where he will go.
Bruce Yang
Changhua
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past