One cannot help help but be impressed by the extent to which Beijing has mastered and refined the art of the propaganda. Within a few months, the Chinese government has managed to crawl out of the hole that it had dug itself with the passage of its "Anti-Secession" Law, and has painted an illusory yet rosy picture about not just the state of cross-strait relations but also its own regime.
According to an international survey conducted by the US-based Pew Research Center for the People, in many countries, China is viewed more favorably than the US. This raises the concern that China's improved image will go a long way in helping it convince the international community to accept the "one China" policy.
This is of course not good news for Taiwan. While the "favorable" image most likely does not reflect China's domestic and diplomatic actions, Beijing is now in a position to manipulate this image to further isolate Taiwan and convince the international community that the cross-strait relationship is an "internal affair" over which foreign countries such as the US and Japan should not meddle.
Ironically, Beijing has a lot of people to thank within Taiwan for the success of its propaganda offensive. Right after the enactment of the Anti Secession Law, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Many commentators within Taiwan agreed that the farce successfully created the illusion that the Taiwanese people are "not that angry" with Beijing, thereby easing mounting international pressure against the Chinese government.
The Lien and Soong trips opened a Pandora's box of unauthorized negotiations with Beijing. In the past, such talks were typically carried out in secret. These days, people just don't care about the authority of the government, and will deal with China with or without government authorization.
If cross-strait relations had genuinely improved after the China visits, then perhaps the pan-blue camp's bout of "freelance diplomacy" would have been worth it. But this is simply not the case. Beijing's policy toward Taiwan has remained the same.
On Friday, Mainland Affairs Council Vice Chairman You Ying-lung (
The documents also characterizes the cross-strait relationship as "grim" and directs the People's Liberation Army to maintain a high degree of combat readiness.
The content of this document is consistent with the findings of a national security report recently submitted to President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). The report also stated that if Beijing launched a military campaign against Taiwan, it will most likely target the nation's non-military infrastructure, such as water purification plants, electricity grids and banking institutions during the first wave of its attack, with the intent of demoralizing the people and striking at their will to resist the invasion. Appropriately, the government has promptly decided to improve and integrate its disaster relief system to help defend against such actions.
It is sad to see that so many Taiwanese people have lost sight of China's military ambitions and are susceptible to its unificationist propaganda. This level of naivety is a growing problem for the country.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS