Later this summer, President Chen Shui-bian (
The report will cover the economy, national defense, cross-strait relations, foreign affairs and homeland protection. In making this report, Chen will be speaking directly to the people, rather than following the US example in which the president makes his State of the Union address to both houses of Congress. However, if the president directly reports to his people rather than to the legislature, this could be interpreted as an attempt by the Executive Yuan to sidestep the hazard of accountability to the Legislative Yuan.
Establishing a presidential system of government will be a priority in the second phase of constitutional reform, and in linking his address to national security, Chen is clearly seeking to establish a precedent by exercising power through the National Security Council (NSC). This will also greatly increase the council's political influence.
If we look back over the history of constitutional amendments, it's clear to see that while the original spirit of the Constitution was closer to that of a dual-executive system, the amendments and the actual practice of the government under former president Lee Teng-hui (
Following the transition of power in 2000 -- and last year's legislative elections -- the pan-blue camp nonetheless retained its legislative majority. The pan-blue camp could use its majority to hold a vote of no confidence in the government, forcing the president to dissolve the legislature, in order to bring about the implementation of a dual-executive system. However, although the pan-blue camp is doing all it can to obstruct the government, it hasn't got the courage to challenge the political structure.
The report to be given by Chen touches on various areas of the Executive Yuan's responsibility, and will have two significant political effects.
First, the powers of the NSC's secretary-general will be enhanced, creating a "dual executive" with a significant overlap in authority and jurisdiction of the council's secretary-general and the premier. In the unlikely event that these two officials find themselves in disagreement, the president will have to play referee to prevent friction between the council and the Executive Yuan.
Second, although the National Security Report will be delivered to the people, the Additional Articles of the Constitution allow the legislature to demand that the president make a State of the Nation report. It will be necessary to give some consideration to the differences or the consonance of these two reports.
If the legislature calls for a State of the Nation report, the president has to comply. The government should follow the example of the US and combine the National Security Report and the State of the Nation address into a constitutionally mandated address to the legislature. This would serve as a clear demonstration of the nation's highest elected official exercising supervision over its highest elected body.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers