Later this summer, President Chen Shui-bian (
The report will cover the economy, national defense, cross-strait relations, foreign affairs and homeland protection. In making this report, Chen will be speaking directly to the people, rather than following the US example in which the president makes his State of the Union address to both houses of Congress. However, if the president directly reports to his people rather than to the legislature, this could be interpreted as an attempt by the Executive Yuan to sidestep the hazard of accountability to the Legislative Yuan.
Establishing a presidential system of government will be a priority in the second phase of constitutional reform, and in linking his address to national security, Chen is clearly seeking to establish a precedent by exercising power through the National Security Council (NSC). This will also greatly increase the council's political influence.
If we look back over the history of constitutional amendments, it's clear to see that while the original spirit of the Constitution was closer to that of a dual-executive system, the amendments and the actual practice of the government under former president Lee Teng-hui (
Following the transition of power in 2000 -- and last year's legislative elections -- the pan-blue camp nonetheless retained its legislative majority. The pan-blue camp could use its majority to hold a vote of no confidence in the government, forcing the president to dissolve the legislature, in order to bring about the implementation of a dual-executive system. However, although the pan-blue camp is doing all it can to obstruct the government, it hasn't got the courage to challenge the political structure.
The report to be given by Chen touches on various areas of the Executive Yuan's responsibility, and will have two significant political effects.
First, the powers of the NSC's secretary-general will be enhanced, creating a "dual executive" with a significant overlap in authority and jurisdiction of the council's secretary-general and the premier. In the unlikely event that these two officials find themselves in disagreement, the president will have to play referee to prevent friction between the council and the Executive Yuan.
Second, although the National Security Report will be delivered to the people, the Additional Articles of the Constitution allow the legislature to demand that the president make a State of the Nation report. It will be necessary to give some consideration to the differences or the consonance of these two reports.
If the legislature calls for a State of the Nation report, the president has to comply. The government should follow the example of the US and combine the National Security Report and the State of the Nation address into a constitutionally mandated address to the legislature. This would serve as a clear demonstration of the nation's highest elected official exercising supervision over its highest elected body.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US