I must largely agree with Chang Sheng-en's (
But I feel that there is more to this issue than is immediately apparent from the statistical analysis of examination results. As a very experienced Australian teacher who has visited my wonderful family in Taiwan many times, I have noted several things about Taiwanese English speakers -- both young and old.
First, through vocal emulation of their teachers, students develop a US accent. This accent in all its forms, from "deep South" origins to the Canadian border, is often difficult for other English speaking people in the world to understand. Naturally students learn by imitating their teachers, but the difference between strongly-accented vowel sounds (as in the US "drawl") and standard, non-colloquial and non-idiomatic written text can cause confusion in an exam situation.
Second, it is necessary to practise conversational and grammatically "correct" English frequently to develop a proficiency in the language. Students need to be immersed in English language and culture to learn it effectively. Unlike Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore and India, Taiwan does not have a residual colonial English culture. English for Taiwanese is as difficult to learn as Chinese is for Westerners.
The English language teaching programs on television and radio are full of heavily-accented US content, and some of the teachers speak rapidly and often leap from topic to topic with little continuity or repetition, and with no visual or contextual cues.
Furthermore, popular US television shows shown in Taiwan are also heavily accented, very idiomatic and the speech is far too rapid -- comments often made about Americans in general.
I feel that all of these combined can present unreasonable and daunting obstacles to students' learning.
I note that many English teaching jobs advertised in Taiwan state that a "North American accent" is preferred, presumably for perceived status, cultural and economic reasons.
But surely, if students are to have some competency in spoken and written English, then exposure to "neutrally accented" teachers is preferable.
English can be a strongly accented language, and even I, a "neutrally accented" Australian with many years of teaching experience, have difficulty understanding not only US English, but also South African, Indian, Scot and Irish-accented English.
Selection of teachers and teaching models should be based not only on qualifications, but on the ability to speak clear and non idiomatic English.
Geoffrey Cartridge
Adelaide, Australia
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS