The recent scandal surrounding People First Party (PFP) Taipei City Councilor and talk show host Mike Wang (
Wang made false (and likely intentional) accusations against six local restaurants. He accused them of selling or reselling food purchased from funeral parlors. The allegation later turned out to be manufactured by members of the city councilor's staff. Although Wang has refused to step down from his post and has blamed the incident on his underlings, the fiasco nonetheless illustrates the unhealthy relationship between politicians and the media.
In today's world of 24-hour news and instant information, where public opinion can change in a flash and missteps are magnified to grandiose proportions, the role of the press should be not only descriptive but also educational.
Regretfully, most people live in the real world, with their hopes, fears, dreams and anxieties, but they are not very good at figuring complex political matters. This leaves rooms for some self-interested politicians to maneuver and exploit the public.
The idea that the media has the power to mold public opinion drives editors, reporters and talk-show hosts to exaggerate and even make up news. Even though the public has complained about this kind of behavior, the people who complain are usually the type of people who are not so influenced by it.
The decades of change in Taiwanese politics and growing press freedom have given birth to intense competition and a decline in the quality of media coverage. Considering that things in Taiwan are so often politicized, the media has gradually lost its focus. Instead, we are seeing a lack of professionalism and an over-emphasis on trivial or sensationalized stories.
As the media gradually loses its self-discipline, it is increasingly becoming a tool for politicians and people with vested interests. Media managers and politicians often believe that newspapers and TV news are all-powerful. But they are wrong. Both believe that politicians are very effective in manipulating what the media says. Wrong again. They are deeply convinced that the media can easily lead voters. Still wrong.
Because of the biased media culture, all parties related to the Mike Wang fraud case automatically fell into the typical cycle of political maneuvering. But the public eventually got the truth in the end -- and they responded. The Wang incident serves as the best example of how the public can hit back.
Opinion polls show that people have become highly suspicious of the media and increasingly sophisticated in spotting its attempts at manipulation. The public now sees the media as a kind of special-interest group, no more objective or independent than any other social group in presenting its view.
Perhaps this is the best time to reform the media. To construct a well-established and institutionalized media culture, several approaches must be taken, and some positive steps have already been made. Through the Radio and Television Law (
Also, the public should exert pressure on politicians and political parties to withdraw from operating or having influence on media firms. People like Wang should cut ties with the press.
Institutional reform is only the first step in providing a fair and competitive environment for the media. Public action constitutes the key to mature media competition. Finally, strengthening public TV would also serve as a model to purify the media culture.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS