Thailand's monsoon rains can sweep across Bangkok with a moment's notice, blacking out the sky and sparking floods that fill the street and then disappear just as quickly as they arrived.
Some 4,000mm of rain pours down on Thailand in a year, most of it between June and December, but shoddy management of the nation's water supply is causing shortages as agriculture, households and industry increase their demands, experts warn.
Demand for water could nearly double within 20 years, from 190 million cubic meters a year to 340 million cubic meters, one study at respected Mahidol University indicates.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
Because rain doesn't fall evenly throughout the year, Thailand is also highly prone to drought. The just-ended dry season brought a drought that scorched 60 of the kingdom's 76 provinces.
To ease the problem, Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra said the military would drill 4,000 new drinking wells, and the government may ask its neighbors about diverting water from the Mekong river to help Thai farmers, a move which would require an agreement with China, Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam, which have also faced problems with drought
But such responses fail to address more pressing needs to change attitudes about water conservation, said environmental expert Kampanad Bhaktikul from Mahidol University.
What he describes as "a severe water shortage" has crept into Thailand over the last decade, with the public largely unaware, he said.
Drilling more wells is "the same as constructing a dam in the time of flood," he said, urging better water conservation.
"What we should do is long-term policy planning, a master plan of water resources development and management," Kampanad said.
People should be allowed more control over water resources in their home area, he said.
But letting local residents take charge of water in their neighborhood is not so simple, said Witoon Permpongsacharoen, who heads the lobby group Foundation for Ecological Recovery.
More than 100 rivers and basins criss-cross the country, but for the past century the Chao Praya river basin around Bangkok has dominated irrigation policy, Witoon said.
"This ignores each individual area's characteristics. The solution of water management should be based on local conditions," he said.
The royal irrigation department has drafted a new four-year national water management plan aimed at a fairer distribution to farmers, households and industry, the agency's chief Samart Chokkanapitark said.
The 200 billion baht (US$4.9 billion) plan, which needs Cabinet approval, covers 25 river basins and could be implemented starting next year.
The water supply problem is "serious," Samart said, because Thailand has enough water but not enough reservoirs and dams to collect it.
The department supplies an average 49,500 million cubic meters of water annually, but some 67,230 million cubic meters is demanded, Samart said.
To reduce the difference, the new plan calls for building dams and replacing leaky pipes, and urging farmers in some areas to replace rice crops with more water-efficient ones including corn or soya beans.
The scheme would also give locals a greater role in managing their water, and would increase Thais' water bills by adding on the cost of treating water. Bangkok residents currently only pay for the cost of using raw water.
Nationally, Thais use an average 200 liters of water per person a day, and 416 liters per person in the Bangkok metropolitan area, Kampanad said.
The figure for the city of more than 7 million people and its surrounding districts includes water used domestically and by industry, Kampanad said.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
RSS