Sean Irving (Letters, June 6, page 8) is right: Many people leave their car engines running unnecessarily, while running errands or waiting, and this is bad for everyone's health. However, he doesn't address the causes, nor does he suggest any practical solutions.
Taiwan is a warm country, and in a parked car under the sun it can get very hot, indeed -- so hot that children left in kindergarten minibuses have died.
Many people leave their engines running so they can use the air conditioning. If I'm waiting in my car with my infant son, I often do this. If it were possible to use the air conditioning without having the engine on, I would certainly do so. Perhaps the government should require all new cars to have this feature.
Also, leaving a car engine running when no one is in the driver's seat could be made a traffic offense, as I believe it is in the UK. But the authorities seem unable or unwilling to properly enforce existing traffic laws, so adding another rule would probably be a waste of time.
Because of the short distances, high population density and stop-start-stop nature of driving here, Taiwan is ideal for electric or hybrid vehicles. I haven't heard of the government doing anything to encourage people to buy these kinds of cars. If it isn't, it should. If it is, it should do more, or do it better.
Steven Crook
Tainan County
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers