Many citizens of France's 24 partners in the EU, or of states that aspire to enter the EU soon, are angry -- indeed, indignant -- at France's rejection of the EU's constitutional treaty. After the Dutch "no," there is fear that distrust of the European project will spread.
The French vote mainly expressed a rejection of the ruling class and deep anxiety about economic prospects. It was a vote of misery and desertion, an impulse moved by panic as well as anger.
But the size of the "no" vote also reflected the persistent lack of a clear explanation by our politicians of what the EU brings to Europeans in terms of wealth, competitiveness, social welfare and, of course, peace. Too often, our politicians disparage Europe and impute to it evils -- like unemployment -- that are really the result of domestic insufficiencies.
ILLUSTRATION: YUSHA
Like many in France, I do not believe that this thunderbolt means the end of Europe. We can and must react positively, and we can do so by returning to basics and offering to Europe's nations, including the French and the Dutch, new challenges and a new spirit.
First, let us express the undeniable facts about Europe's Union. Above all, Europe means peace. Peace was at the heart of the ambition of Europe's founding fathers. It returned as an animating and unifying force with the collapse of communism and the Balkan wars of a decade ago. Peace is also a living issue today, given global terrorism and Europe's unbreakable alliance with the US.
It is wrong to pretend that the risk of war is behind us. If Europe's vigilance breaks down, violent conflict will become a possibility once again. A united Europe can respond to these dangers in ways that no single state can. Moreover, no single state can weigh in on international negotiations and offer solutions to economic rivalries or trade issues that threaten to degenerate into political clashes.
Europe also inculcates democratic values. The Union helped countries in southern Europe overthrow authoritarian regimes in the 1980s, and helped countries in Europe's East become democracies in the 1990s.
EU enlargement is not only an economic duty to be borne by the richest nations; it is also the recognition of a common history and a shared culture. The wealthy West does not have the right to abandon this task, and it must welcome into the same community of destiny all democratic countries east to Russia if they meet EU criteria.
Europe also means prosperity and, for the countries that joined the EU recently or will join shortly, the promise of prosperity. All countries face, to different degrees, economic problems. But there is a model, simultaneously economic and social, that only Europe embodies. The European framework is exacting but necessary. It is as far from being a controlled economy as it is from resembling the libertarian anarchism that many French opponents of the constitutional treaty fear. It is a framework that is based on a discipline and solidarity within and between member states from which no one can be exempt.
To be sure, behind the union's great schemes lurks another EU that is excessively bureaucratic. But it also must be recognized that the EU built its success on its meticulous processes and ability to regulate economic life for the benefit of all. It was in this way that it radically transformed economies and societies for the better.
Nor can we overlook the banal bargaining of European leaders, the quarrels over budgets and the rise of national egoisms whenever elections loom. True, such political infighting makes the EU appear as if it were no longer motivated by great and noble ambitions. Even the constitutional treaty, which should have been a clarion call for all Europeans, was allowed to become bogged down in minutiae. Indeed, today no European political figure of global stature offers an ambition that resonates.
So our task is to offer Europe a new foundation and a new impulse. We need founding fathers -- or mothers -- and nations moved by a clear understanding of their interests and a popular enthusiasm for integration. The road will be long. But we must be confident that we can move domestic politics to higher considerations.
Europe's academics, senior civil servants, business executives and trade unionists must work together to build a project that expresses a new frontier. If we are unable to build a new idea of and for Europe, all that Europe has achieved in the last 50 years will be put at risk.
Nicolas Tenzer is president of the Centre d'etude et de reflexion pour l'action politique in Paris and director of the journal Le Banquet.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past