Michel and Vanessa Wilmotte have been together for eight years. They met as students at a Lionel Jospin rally a matter of weeks before the former Socialist prime minister was elected and have campaigned together in every local, regional, national and European election since.
"This is the first time we've quarrelled, I mean really quarrelled, over politics," said Vanessa, who will vote yes on Sunday. "It gets quite nasty, and it's almost every night. Neither of us can make the other understand. I'm abandoning my principles, he says."
France's referendum on the EU constitution is dividing couples and families, splitting work and classmates, and causing upsets in bars and bistros. It is dominating the newspapers, television and the radio. Even the line at the local boulangerie (bakery) has come under its sway.
"The French were tired of politics," said the left-leaning paper Liberation in a recent editorial. "Tired of seeing the same faces, the same names; of trying in vain to detect a difference between right and left. And then the referendum arrived. The debate took off. And France's taste for politics has returned."
Miki, a waitress at a sushi bar near the Opera, said she had witnessed "some real rows, sometimes almost fights. The other day there were four men, business acquaintances I think, at lunch; three yes and a no. Twice we had to ask them to stop shouting, and then the no guy just got up and left, in the middle of his meal."
Le Parisien visited a retirement home outside Paris on Sunday and reported proudly that octogenarian pensioners were exchanging heated insults and throwing each others' copies of the EU constitution in the trash.
"It's perfectly normal that we should discuss this," Jeanne Becquerel, 84, told the paper. "We're French!"
At a small firm of management consultants above the Guardian's Paris office Jacqueline, 38 and a firm yes, said some staff had "definitely changed their habits. People who never used to lunch together now go out every day, others have stopped socializing with each other altogether. You're fed up with the argument, but you can't stop coming back to it."
Most encounters remain more or less civil. At Versailles market last weekend a bevy of matronly center-right Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (UMP) ladies were merrily thrusting yes pamphlets into the hands of passing shoppers just meters from two besuited supporters of Philippe de Villiers's pro-sovereignty Mouvement pour la France, who were politely exhorting a "non."
"It's quite good-natured here," Valerie said. "It is Sunday, after all."
A no campaigner agreed: "We disagree, but it stays within the bounds of the polite. The lowest form of debate is to insult your opponent."
Elsewhere, though, passions have spilled over. A UMP student was spat at on the Place de la Republique one evening last week by half a dozen anti-globalization activists who tore up his tracts and pushed him over. And more than one family occasion, from birthdays to christenings, has been ruined.
"Later in the evening, it all just came out," Noemie, a translator, said of a family dinner to celebrate her brother's 30th birthday.
"People were calling each other terrible names; commies and fascos, traitors and cowards," she said.
But, as one 50-something woman in the boulangerie line on Sunday said: "It feels good to know we can still get excited by politics. Makes me feel quite nostalgic."
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past