Lee Khai Leong, a lieutenant-colonel in Singapore's navy, surveys the Malacca and Singapore straits from the bridge of a Russian-built container ship and speaks of a maritime nightmare.
Pointing to a narrow sea lane south of Singapore that carries one-quarter of the globe's trade and nearly all oil imports for Japan and China, Lee says one big attack there could hit the world economy by crippling one of Asia's most critical waterways.
"If a big ship ever grounds itself there, it would close the whole straits. There are a few other scary scenarios. But that is a big concern," he said aboard the 16,000-tonne MV Avatar, a commercial ship leased by Singapore's navy for drills.
Maritime analysts have long warned of the far-reaching perils of such an attack: freight rates could surge 500 percent or more as ships carrying much of Asia's oil requirements make a detour of around 1,000km through the Indonesian archipelago.
Lee prefers not to discuss threats to waters that carry about 55,000 ships a year.
"We wonder if we are putting ideas into these people's heads," he says.
But Singapore's navy is preparing for the worst after violent and sophisticated pirate attacks, based largely out of Muslim neighbor Indonesia, heightened fears at Asian and Western security agencies of a seaborne terrorist strike.
Shortly after Lee spoke, the Avatar steamed past the world's largest container shipping port on Singapore's southeastern coast to within view of the oil refineries on its west coast, before slowing its engines.
Lee began preparations to demonstrate a new elite unit of soldiers, police and engineering specialists who in March began boarding and securing ships deemed at the highest risk of attack.
Tankers laden with liquefied petroleum gas fit the category, as do those with large explosive, toxic or polluting cargo that could turn a commercial container ship into a floating bomb.
As Lee gave commands over a walkie-talkie, a small police boat pulled up alongside the Avatar, whose crew dropped a wooden ladder over its side. One by one, marshals in commando gear -- clad in bullet-proof vests and armed with sub-machine guns or side-arms -- clambered aboard.
Shadowed by fewer than a dozen journalists invited for the demonstration, they fanned across the ship, checking the engine room and securing the captain's bridge. They would stay aboard for about an hour, possibly more or less, depending on the ship.
"At the moment we alert the ships in advance and let them know we are coming. But in the future we won't alert them," said Lee, declining to say how many times the new Accompanying Sea Security Teams (ASSeT) were deployed this year. "What I can say is that we haven't had any incidents yet."
Indonesia and Malaysia -- which also share the Malacca Strait -- are considering allowing weapons on ships after several pirate attacks this year revealed a bolder and more violent streak of the sea piracy that has bedeviled Southeast Asia for centuries.
Foreign ministers from Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia will meet on the Indonesian island of Batam next month to discuss allowing commercial vessels to arm themselves, but Singapore and Malaysia are alone in providing armed escorts in their waters.
"Within Singapore's section, I would say that is well guarded, well patrolled and very safe," said Michael Richardson, author of A Time Bomb for Global Trade, a book about the Malacca and Singapore straits.
"The problem is when you get into particularly the Indonesian controlled section of both the Singapore Strait and the Malacca Strait," Richardson said.
The International Maritime Bureau recorded 37 attacks last year on vessels in the Malacca Strait, second only to Indonesia, which has the world's most pirate-infested coast line. Most Malacca Strait attacks occur in Malaysian or Indonesian waters.
A hijacking by gun-wielding pirates of a shipload of tin worth US$4.6 million in Indonesian waters last month highlighted the lawlessness that analysts say terrorists could exploit. The ship was ransacked while en route to Singapore.
Security analysts say the attacks highlight the need for tougher -- possibly international -- intervention. But Malaysia and Indonesia have cited concerns in the past over sovereignty, pointing out that the waters -- just a few nautical miles wide in places -- are mostly national, not international.
Fears among some states that the US was seeking a policing role were a factor behind the launch last year of coordinated patrols by Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore.
A private company, Background Asia Risk Solutions, has provided armed escort services in the region for a year, but Malaysia and Indonesia are staunchly opposed to armed mercenaries in their waters.
"If we leave security patrols to civilians, this might result in a reaction or incidents that are hard to control," Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was quoted by the official Bernama news agency as saying late last week.
Few are as alarmed as Singapore, which relies heavily on sea trade for its US$110 billion economy and has warned repeatedly of possible links of piracy and terrorism after uncovering a plot in 2001 by Jemaah Islamiah militants to attack US naval ships in its waters.
"All it takes is one incident and the confidence of all the nations who use the ports in the region will be shaken, not to mention the economic impact," said Lee, a 25-year navy veteran who oversees the ASSeT operation.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS