The recent visits to China by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) even said that Soong promised to support the passage of this crucial piece of national security legislation on the eve of his China visit. But on Tuesday, the PFP and the KMT once again jointly struck the arms-procurement bill -- along with a number of other bills proposed by the pan-green camp -- from the agenda. It is clear that as long as the pan-blues still enjoy a legislative majority, the chances that the bill will be passed are slim. Since both Lien and Soong see themselves as Chinese, how can they ever agree to allow Taiwan to purchase weapons to defend themselves against China's military aggression?
During last year's presidential election campaign, both Lien and Soong prostrated themselves and kissed the ground in an attempt to prove their love for Taiwan. In retrospect, their acts seem preposterous and hypocritical.
We still remember when in 1979 the late pope John Paul II returned to his homeland of Poland, 10 years after he left it. The pope's first action when he stepped off the plane in Warsaw was to kneel down and kiss the ground. This image has been burned into the minds of people around the world and has become a symbol of separation from one's home country. The pope's love for his country never changed, and commentators believe that the pope played an important part in helping the labor group Solidarity defeat Poland's communist government. There was no conflict between the pope's religious status and his status as a Pole, and he could be both a great pope and an outstanding Pole.
We have seen on TV how Lien and Soong returned to their old country, China. In particular, we saw how the wooden Lien suddenly showed a sense of humor, and how Soong could not hold back tears when paying his respects to his ancestors in Hunan Province. This reveals how much passion is stirred by one's homeland. This is a normal human reaction. The problem is that their status as Chinese is not compatible with their status as leaders of Taiwanese opposition parties. At a time when China is blocking Taiwan's participation in the international community and even threatening our national security, how can we place any trust in political parties that favor China?
This underlines the fundamental choice in Taiwan's electoral politics. When people vote they are not so much choosing between political ideals, but rather choosing between Taiwan and China. There is no better example of this than the attitude being taken by the various political parties to the arms-procurement bill. The parties that identify with Taiwan are all in favor of purchasing advanced weapons to improve the nation's defenses, while those who identify with China take their cue from the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
During their visits, China offered Lien and Soong gifts -- including pandas, better trade terms for Taiwan's fruit and a lifting of restrictions on tourist travel to Taiwan -- in a bid to help the pan-blue camp win votes in the National Assembly elections. Although Beijing did not succeed in "buying" votes with such offers, it successfully won over the two opposition leaders. So, not only is China the home country of both Lien and Soong, even the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has become their political ally.
It is hardly surprising that some pan-green supporters also object to the procurement of advanced weapons, though for different reasons to the pan-blue camp. Their fear is that in the event of a conflict, the pan-blue camp will turn over Taiwan's weapons to the People's Liberation Army (PLA), and join them in turning against the US. This is Taiwan's ultimate nightmare.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS